Immunogenicity and Safety PCV-20 of the Vaccine Administered During an Acute Febrile Illness in Adults

Overview

Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for serious infections associated to numerous hospitalizations and high rate of mortality. The incidence and therefore the burden of pneumococcal infections have been significantly reduced thanks to the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs). PCVs were shown to be effective against vaccine-type serotypes causing both non-invasive and invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD) in children and adults. PCVs use in children was shown to have an impact on IPD incidence among adults due to herd immunity and on antimicrobial resistance. To increase the protection of at-risk patients against IPD, the 20-valent PCV (PCV-20) is recently recommended in adults, after a period where PCV-13 followed by pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 valent (PPV-23) was recommended. PCV-20 effectiveness against IPD and against pneumonia was inferred from immunobridging with PCV-13. Indeed PCV-13 was shown effective to reduce the incidence of low respiratory tract infections and IPD (bacteraemia and meningitis) in 65-years-old-adults and older. Currently immunization against S. pneumoniae is recommended with PCV-20 for adult patients at-risk for IPD such as immunocompromised (=high-risk patients) and in immunocompetent people with underlying chronic conditions (cardiovascular, liver, pulmonary, kidney diseases and diabetes mellitus) (=medium risk patients). However, vaccine coverage against IPD in adults remains low globally, and does not exceed 5 % in France. Reducing missed opportunities of vaccination for S. pneumoniae is crucial.

Patients at-risk of IPD are very frequently hospitalized for acute febrile illnesses. More than 50 % of the IPD at-risk patients hospitalized for an IPD or a pneumonia have been admitted to the hospital during the past 5 years without receiving a pneumococcal vaccination. Hospitalization appears to be therefore an opportunity to provide vaccines. However, physicians usually consider that vaccines should be postponed during an acute febrile illness including if non-severe. This consideration of not vaccinating during an acute febrile illness is however not evidence-based. This is associated to concerns about a potential risk of an impaired response to the vaccine and safety. In children, data about vaccination during a febrile illness have shown no safety nor efficacy concerns. In most countries, recommendations regarding this particular point are unclear. In fine, vaccination is then rarely provided during the hospital stay as well as after discharge including in the USA, a country where it is recommended to vaccinate whatever the body temperature is and during hospitalization. Reluctance to immunize adults in this situation is probably due to the absence of evidence showing that it is as effective and safe as vaccinating patients without an acute or febrile illness. To reduce the number of missed opportunities to immunize adults against S. pneumoniae, investigators aim to demonstrate that the administration of PCV-20 during an acute non-severe febrile illness is non-inferior than the administration one month after fever resolution in terms of immunogenicity (assessed by vaccine types (VT) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations and at least 2-fold change increase), and that it is as safe.