The primary goal of this observational study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary approach based on pharmacogenetics, TDM (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring) and MedReview into the clinical practice in order to optimize the appropriateness of drugs prescription and to minimise the risk of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in adult cancer patients and in pediatric patients affected by chronic inflammatory diseases. This approach of active pharmacovigilance will also allow a better definition of the causality assessment of ADRs through the direct implementation of data quality in the reporting forms. The study may therefore constitute an example of an approach for both the prevention of ADRs and the optimization of drug use, and for the integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM, and the MedReview data into the National Pharmacovigilance Reports for an improved and innovative evaluation of adverse events, aiming at the implementation of this approach in the regional context.
Primary aim of the study: To implement the use of pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview at the regional level supporting their utility through an observational approach to assess the effects of these innovative methods, already active in IRCCS, for the optimization of appropriate drug use and minimization of ADR risk in adult and pediatric oncology patients, as well as pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. Specifically, the aim is to evaluate the incidence of ADRs in patients treated based on pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview compared to historical cases treated according to the standard of care before the implementation of the proposed innovative methodologies. Secondary aims of the study: 1. To evaluate the "Causality Assessment" between ADR and drug based on the enhanced data quality deriving from the integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview into the Pharmacovigilance report. 2. To propose the systematic integration of the results related to pharmacogenetics, TDM, and MedReview within the existing fields of the current ADR reporting form. This aims to develop a proposal for updating AIFA procedures related to the inclusion of this type of evidence-based information in the National Pharmacovigilance Network (RNF), with a potential update of the reporting form.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
450
Patients will undergo pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview analyses according to the study protocol
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)
Aviano, Pordenone, Italy
RECRUITINGIRCCS materno infantile Burlo Garofolo di Trieste
Trieste, Trieste, Italy
RECRUITINGPatients treated with study drugs tested with pharmacogenetic and TDM analysis
Percentage of patients treated with study drugs tested with pharmacogenetic and TDM analysis on total patients treated
Time frame: Up to 2 years
MedReview reports
Number of MedReview reports
Time frame: Up to 2 years
ADRs in patients treated on the basis of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview
Incidence of ADRs in the study cohorts
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Comparison of ADRs in patients treated on the basis of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview and retrospective data
Difference in incidence of ADRs in the prospective cohort will be tested against historical data with binomial test
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Integration of pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview information in the existing tool for the evaluation of "Causality assessment" between ADR and specific drug
Change of Causality Assessment. The change is evaluated as the number of "definite" and "probable" associations between ADRs and suspected drugs compared with historical data
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Proposal for updating the pharmacovigilance reporting forms including Pharmacogenetics, TDM and MedReview information in the National Network of Pharmacovigilance
Frequencies of new reports sent to the National Pharmacovigilance Network, including pharmacogenetics, TDM, and drug interaction data
Time frame: Up to 2 years
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 v3
The EORTC QLG Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients. The possible answers to the questionnaire range from a minimum value ("not at all") to a maximum value ("very much"). Higher values indicate a worse quality of life. Mean and standard deviation of scores at EORTC QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire will be evaluated.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Costs of ADRs management
Median and interquartile range of costs
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Concordance between plasmatic concentration measured with conventional methods and with new methods such as Dried Blood Spot (DBS)
Lin's correlation coefficient between plasmatic concentration and DBS estimation
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Correlation between pharmacogenetic profile and drug exposure (TDM)
Difference in drug exposure measured as Cmin for different pharmacogenetic profiles
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Correlation between ADRs, TDM and pharmacogenetics analyses
Frequencies of ADRs in different subgroups of patients defined by TDM and pharmacogenetic profiles
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Correlation between ADRs, TDM and pharmacogenetics analyses
Frequencies of severe ADRs in different subgroups of patients defined by TDM and pharmacogenetic profiles
Time frame: Up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.