The web application gp-multitool.de is a digital tool for implementing the German S3 clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity of the German Society of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in primary care. The tool enhances evidence-based and patient-centered care by assessing and providing information relevant for the primary care of this patient group. This cluster-randomised clinical evaluation study examines the effectiveness of an intervention based on gp-multitool.de in general practitioner (GP) practices in Germany.
The web application gp-multitool.de study is a digital tool for implementing the German S3 clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity of the German Society of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in primary care. The tool enhances evidence-based and patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity by assessing and providing information relevant for the primary care of this patient group. The study intervention is based on this digital tool and aims to reduce the probability of hospital admissions (primary outcome) and their outpatient health care use, and to improve process quality of care, patients' health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction (secondary outcomes). This cluster-randomized clinical evaluation study examines the effectiveness of the gp-multitool.de intervention in GP practices. GPs in the intervention group implement the intervention in consultations with participating patients for 12 months. Intervention GPs gain access to the digital tool, and get a brief introduction to its functionalities, a video tutorial, a written manual, and contact data of telephone support, which can be called in case of any technical or organizational problems in relation to the digital tool. In addition, they receive a short training in the intervention and a checklist of requirements defined in the study protocol. Moreover, each intervention practice will be provided with a mobile device, facilitating inclusion of patients without access to the internet. GPs in the control group receive no intervention and provide care as usual. Patients will be recruited from GP practices in urban and rural administrative districts in Germany. The evaluation study is based on telephone interviews of patients and their GPs. Practices will be randomized after the baseline assessment by an independent statistician who does not have access to the assessed patient and practice data. The primary outcome will be analyzed using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model, and secondary outcomes will be analyzed by multilevel mixed-effects linear and negative-binomial regression models. The project staff conducting patient interviews will be blinded regarding allocation of the patient's practices.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
660
The intervention is based on the digital tool gp-multitool.de. The GPs can send questionnaires by email to patients and patients can fill out questionnaires at their home or in the waiting room of the practice using any digital device with browser and access to the internet. The digital tool also includes instructions for conducting a medication review. Results will be available from the computers of attending GPs. Decisions from talks between GPs and patients can be documented in the tool. The tool includes ten questionnaires: 1. patient preferences (including a. treatment goals, and b. involvement of other persons in decision making); 2. social life (including a. activities and participation, and b. social support); 3. treatment situation (including a. problems with medication, and b. treatment burden); 4. health complaints (including a. pain, b. psychiatric disorders, and c. other complaints). 5. resilience and protective behavior against heat.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
RECRUITINGWhether patients have stayed at least once for at least one night in hospital during the preceding twelve months
The outcome will be assessed by a standardised questionnaire. The patients will be asked how often they had been in hospital during the preceding twelve months and how long these stays had lasted. Before analysis, the outcome will be dichotomised.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
The number of contacts with the GP during the preceding twelve months
The outcome will be assessed by asking the patients how often they had visited their GP during the preceding twelve months.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
The number of contacts with outpatient specialists during the preceding twelve months
The outcome will be assessed by asking the patients how often they had visited outpatient specialists during the preceding twelve months.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
Quality of care as assessed by the summary score of the "GP-reported core set of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care" during the preceding twelve months
The outcome will be assessed by the "GP-reported core set of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care" (Schäfer I et al. 2023, digital object identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02856-0), which has a possible range between 0 and 12 points. Higher scores indicate a better quality of primary care.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
Quality of care as assessed by the summary score of the "patient-reported core set of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care" during the preceding twelve months
The outcome will be assessed by the "Patient-reported core set of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care" (Schäfer I et al. 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02856-0), which has a possible range between 0 and 7 points. Higher scores indicate a better quality of primary care.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
Self-rated health as assessed by the EuroQoL visual analogue scale
The outcome will be assessed by the EuroQoL visual analogue scale (Herdman M et al. 2011, DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x), which has a possible range between 0 and 100 points. Higher scores indicate a better self-rated health.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
Health-related quality of life as assessed by the "Short-Form-Health Survey (SF-12)" questionnaire
The outcome will be assessed by the "Short-Form-Health Survey (SF-12)" questionnaire (Wirtz M.A. et al. 2018, DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000205), which has a possible range between 0 and 100 points. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
Patient satisfaction with chronic illness care assessed by the "Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC 5A)" questionnaire
The outcome will be assessed by the "PACIC 5A" questionnaire (Rosemann T et al. 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00786.x), which has a possible range between 1 and 5 points. Higher scores indicate a higher patient satisfaction with chronic illness care from patient's perspective.
Time frame: Once at baseline (before randomization of practices) and once at follow-up (immediately after the intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.