The Effect of Using Reciprocal Files Alone and with Different Files on Postoperative Pain

Overview

This study aims to investigate the effects of using the Wave One Gold file alone and in combination with different files on postoperative pain in patients with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The results of the study may provide important insights into the impact of these file systems on postoperative pain. . The main questions it aims to answer are: It will also reveal whether reciprocating files can be used alone or not. Participants will: Go under treatment with different shaping protocols The researchers will shape using only the Wave One gold file in the first group. In the second group, they will first perform coronal shaping with the One Flare file and then complete the final shaping with the Wave One Gold file In the third group, coronal shaping will first be performed with the One Flare, followed by working length shaping with the Wave One Gold glider file, and the final shaping will again be completed with the Wave One file. For sham group Using a #10K-type stainless-steel file, the operator will establish the working length 0.5 mm short of the apex indicated by the apex locator and will confirm it on periapical radiograph. The operator will prepare the glide path using a #15K-type stainless-steel hand file with push-pull motion.On sensing resistance, the file will withdraw. recapitulation was performed with a #10K-type operator then will irrigate the root canals with 2 mL of 5%NaOCl . Then, they will be shaped using WaveOne Gold Glider and WaveOne in reciprocal mode. After the treatment, the patient's pain score will be recorded. They will Visit the clinic three days later Keep avisual analogue scala of their symptoms and than compare different shaping protocols

Randomization The names of systems will write on the papers, the papers will fold, and these papers will placed into a dark box, which cannot be seen from theoutside. Before each treatment, the clinical assistant chose a paper randomly from the dark box and the system written in that paper will applied to the patient. Treatment Protocol A single operator will performe root canal treatment for all the patients in 2 sessions. The operator will administer local anesthesia with 2 mL of 4 articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine (Ultracain DS Fort; Aventis \_ Ilaç A.S x, Istanbul, Turkey) 10 minute before the procedure. Then, the tooth of interest will isolate using a rubber dam. Caries or coronal restorations will remove completely, and the endodontic access cavity will open using diamond fissure burs(Diatech,Diamant AG, Switzerland) under water-cooled conditions. After negotiating the root canal orifices, the apical patency of the teeth wil checked The study will be examined wave one gold with/without one flare and wave one gold glider. First, in the first group, the Wave One Gold file will be used as a single-file system according to the manufacturer's usage instructions. In the second group, the One Flare file will be used first, and the final shaping will be done with the Wave One Gold file. In the third group, the One Flare file will be used first, followed by the Wave One Gold glider, and the final shaping will be performed with the Wave One Gold file. As a rinsing protocol, each file change will be followed by a rinse with 2 mL of using a side-perforated 30 G needle . In the final rinse, 10 mL of 17% EDTA and 10 mL of 2.5% NaOCl will be activated ultrasonically. Later, patients will be informed about the visual analog scale (VAS). Patients will be called for a check-up three days later. The evaluation scores of the patients and their use of painkillers will be noted. Statistical analysis A sample size calculation was performed using the G∗Power software (G∗Power 3.1.9.7; Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany) based on a 0.05 type I error, 80% power, and an effect size of 0.25. According to Cohen, the minimum sample size required to detect differences in postoperative pain intensity among 4 study groups at 3 time points would be 36. Since this study was analyzed using non-parametric methods, a decision was made to include 42 patients (36 \* 1.15 = 42) as suggested by Lehmann, with 42 patients allocated to each group; this number was sufficient to ensure statistical significance. In comparing multiple group contrasts and repeated measurements, ANOVA test will be used. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be employed to check for normal distribution of the data.