This study examines how Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) combined with the Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver (ADIM) affects balance, gait, and breathing in stroke patients. It aims to determine whether this combined intervention improves mobility and respiratory function more effectively than standard rehabilitation.
This study investigates the effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) and Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver (ADIM) on stroke rehabilitation. IMT involves resistance-based breathing exercises to strengthen the inspiratory muscles and improve pulmonary function, while ADIM focuses on activating the deep abdominal muscles, particularly the transversus abdominis, to enhance trunk stability and postural control. Participants in the intervention group perform IMT using a threshold resistance device, starting at 30% of MIP and progressively increasing to 60% MIP over four weeks. ADIM exercises are conducted with verbal and manual guidance to ensure proper engagement of core muscles. Sessions are held five times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting 40 minutes (20 minutes for each intervention). The control group receives conventional rehabilitation without resistance-based inspiratory training. The study utilizes TIS, BBS and TUG to assess balance, FGA to evaluate gait performance, and MIP and MEP to measure respiratory function. Assessments are conducted before and after the intervention to evaluate changes resulting from the treatment. Eligible participants are individuals with subacute stroke (onset within 1-6 months), an MMSE-K score of 24 or higher, and the ability to walk at least 6 meters with or without an assistive device. Exclusion criteria include conditions prohibiting the Valsalva maneuver (e.g., glaucoma, aneurysm, pulmonary hypertension), acute respiratory infections, severe cognitive or language impairments, prior inspiratory muscle training within the past six months, unstable medical conditions, and neurological or musculoskeletal disorders affecting gait and balance. This study aims to determine whether the combined application of IMT and ADIM enhances functional recovery, improves postural control, and promotes better respiratory health in stroke patients. The findings may contribute to the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies for improving quality of life in individuals recovering from stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
ADIM aims to enhance trunk stability by selectively activating the transversus abdominis. Participants begin in a supine position and practice drawing in their abdomen toward the spine while maintaining a stable trunk and pelvis. A therapist provides verbal instructions and manual guidance to ensure proper muscle activation. IMT is performed using the Threshold RMT device (IMT, GH INNOTEK, Busan, South Korea). Participants wear a nose clip and start with 30% of Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP), gradually increasing by 10% per week to reach 60% MIP by the final week. Each session consists of five sets of 10-15 repetitions, with a one-minute rest between sets.
Sham IMT with ADIM training performs the same ADIM protocol as the IMT with ADIM training but undergoes IMT with minimal resistance (0 cmH₂O) to prevent actual muscle strengthening. This design ensures that the effects observed can be attributed to IMT rather than ADIM.
Zenith Hospital
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Change in Trunk Control as Measured by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
The TIS assesses trunk stability, coordination, and dynamic sitting balance in participants. It consists of three subscales: static sitting balance (score range: 0-7), dynamic sitting balance (score range: 0-10), and trunk coordination (score range: 0-6). The total score ranges from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating better trunk control. The test is conducted with the participant seated on a firm, stable surface without back or arm support.
Time frame: change from Baseline to 4 weeks post intervention
Change in Functional Mobility as Measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
TUG Test assesses functional mobility and fall risk. Participants start seated, stand up at a signal, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. The test is timed in seconds, with lower times indicating better mobility. A time exceeding 14 seconds suggests an increased fall risk.
Time frame: change from Baseline to 4 weeks post intervention
Change in Balance Ability as Measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
BBS evaluates balance and fall risk through 14 items, covering sitting, standing, and positional changes. Each item is scored from 0 (unable) to 4 (normal performance), with a total possible score of 0 to 56. Scores below 44 indicate a high fall risk.
Time frame: change from Baseline to 4 weeks post intervention
Change in Gait Performance as Measured by the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
FGA evaluates dynamic walking ability. It consists of 10 tasks, including walking with head turns, speed changes, and obstacle navigation. Each item is scored from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal performance), with a total possible score of 0 to 30. A lower score indicates greater functional impairment.
Time frame: change from Baseline to 4 weeks post intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Respiratory Muscle Strength as Measured by Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) and Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
MIP and MEP measure respiratory muscle strength using a manometer (Pony Fx, Cosmed, Italy). MIP reflects diaphragm and inspiratory muscle strength, while MEP measures expiratory muscle power. Participants are seated, wear a nose clip, and perform three attempts with the highest value recorded.
Time frame: change from Baseline to 4 weeks post intervention