This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation in improving cognitive, emotional, social, and motor functions in patients with neurological disorders (ABI, SCI, MS, PD). It investigates whether VR improves motor and cognitive functions more than traditional therapy, identifies neurophysiological changes (EEG, fNIRS, MRI), and assesses the integration of VR with NIBS or telerehabilitation. Conducted over three years at IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, participants are randomly assigned to either a VR training group or an active control group receiving traditional rehabilitation. Procedures include baseline assessments (T0), 20 rehabilitation sessions over 8 weeks, post-intervention evaluations (T1), and a 3-month follow-up (T2). Primary outcomes measure motor and cognitive function (MoCA, MMSE, FIM, TUG, Berg Balance Scale), neurophysiological changes (EEG, MRI, fNIRS, motion analysis), and emotional/social function (Empathy Quotient, Hamilton Depression Scale).
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation in improving cognitive, emotional, social, and motor functions in patients with neurological and neurodegenerative disorders (Acquired Brain Injuries, Spinal Cord Injuries, Multiple Sclerosis, and Parkinson's Disease). The study also explores neurophysiological changes and the potential benefits of combining VR with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and telerehabilitation. Objectives: Primary Objectives: Assess the effectiveness of VR-based rehabilitation in enhancing cognitive and motor functions. Identify neurophysiological changes (EEG, fNIRS, MRI) associated with functional recovery. Secondary Objectives: Identify behavioral and neurophysiological biomarkers predictive of rehabilitation outcomes. Compare the effectiveness of different VR devices for rehabilitation. Evaluate the impact of VR telerehabilitation on recovery and continuity of care. Explore the synergistic effects of VR combined with NIBS. Methods: Study Site: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo. Duration: 3 years. Participants: 328 individuals with neurological disorders (18-75 years old). Design: Participants will be randomized into two groups: VR Training Group: Engages in immersive VR-based rehabilitation. Active Control Group: Receives conventional therapy. Sessions: 20 sessions over 8 weeks (3 times per week). Assessments at 3 time points: T0 (Baseline): Neurological, neuropsychological, motor, and neurophysiological evaluations. T1 (Post-intervention): Repeat assessments to measure immediate effects. T2 (Follow-up at 3 months): Evaluate the maintenance of improvements. Assessments \& Outcome Measures: Cognitive Function: MoCA, MMSE, ACE-R, Rao's Battery. Motor Function: Functional Independence Measure (FIM), TUG, Tinetti Scale, Berg Balance Scale. Neurophysiological Changes: EEG, fNIRS, MRI, eye-tracking, motion analysis, sEMG. Emotional \& Social Function: Short Empathy Quotient (EQ-short), Faux Pas Test, Hamilton Depression Scale. Usability \& Acceptance: System Usability Scale (SUS). Expected Impact: This study aims to advance personalized rehabilitation strategies, improve accessibility to innovative therapies (e.g., telerehabilitation), and optimize the use of VR-based interventions in clinical practice.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
328
Participants in the VR Training Group will undergo a virtual reality-based rehabilitation program designed to improve cognitive, emotional, social, and motor functions. The intervention consists of 20 sessions over 8 weeks (3 sessions per week), using immersive and non-immersive VR systems tailored to individual needs. The program integrates interactive exercises, real-time feedback, and task-oriented training to enhance motor function, cognitive abilities, and patient engagement. Neurophysiological changes will be monitored through EEG, MRI, and motion analysis to assess brain plasticity and functional improvements.
Participants in the Active Control Group will receive traditional cognitive and motor rehabilitation following standard clinical practices. The intervention consists of 20 sessions over 8 weeks (3 sessions per week), focusing on conventional physical therapy, cognitive training, and task-oriented exercises to enhance motor function and cognitive abilities. This group serves as a comparison to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based rehabilitation. Neurophysiological changes will be monitored using EEG, MRI, and motion analysis to assess functional improvements.
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
Messina, Italy/Me, Italy
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
Messina, Italy/Me, Italy
Improvement in Cognitive Function
Change in cognitive function from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) and follow-up at 3 months (T2), assessed through standardized neuropsychological tests (Montreal Cognitive Assessment - MOCA). A clinically significant improvement is defined as a measurable increase in at least two subscales of the respective cognitive tests.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-Intervention (T1: 8 weeks), and Follow-Up (T2: 3 months post-intervention).
Improvement in Motor Function
Change in motor function from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) and follow-up at 3 months (T2), assessed through standardized clinical tests, including the Berg Balance Scale. A clinically significant improvement is defined as a measurable increase in functional mobility and balance scores.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-Intervention (T1: 8 weeks), and Follow-Up (T2: 3 months post-intervention).
Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Rehabilitation
Change in neurophysiological markers from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) and follow-up (T2), assessed through EEG. Significant changes will be identified based on increased functional connectivity and structural adaptations indicative of neuroplasticity.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-Intervention (T1: 8 weeks), and Follow-Up (T2: 3 months post-intervention).
Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation
Comparison of functional improvements between participants receiving VR-based rehabilitation in clinical settings versus those undergoing a telerehabilitation protocol. Changes in motor and cognitive function will be assessed from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1) and follow-up (T2) using MoCA. Accessibility, adherence, and patient-reported outcomes will also be analyzed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of remote VR-based rehabilitation.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), Post-Intervention (T1: 8 weeks), and Follow-Up (T2: 3 months post-intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.