The Effect of Different Risk Factors on the Success Rate of VPT

Overview

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various vital pulp therapy (VPT) methods, such as direct pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, and total pulpotomy, in maintaining pulp vitality following pulp exposure. It explores the success rates of these treatments compared and investigates co-factors influencing these rates, including age. This prospective cohort study involves patients over 18 with restorable teeth and exposed pulp chambers. Success is measured through clinical and radiological criteria over a follow-up period of up to four years. The study also aims to identify if there's an age threshold affecting the preference for VPT over root canal therapy.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to explore the effectiveness of different VPT methods after pulp exposure. A secondary objective is to establish the relationship between success rate, age and other co-factors. Study methodology: We plan a single-centre, three-arm, observational prospective cohort study. The study will be organised and hosted by the Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University. Patients for the study will be selected from patients presenting at the ambulance of the Semmelweis University Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. For patients who meet the inclusion criteria, we record the patient's baseline clinical data Baseline data, as well as information obtained during the study and findings during follow-up (7 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years) are recorded by the interventionalist in an online database (REDCap). Interventions are carried out according to the following steps: After local anaesthesia (Lidocaine-adrenaline 20 mg/0.01 mg/ml, Egis, Budapest, Hungary) and mouth rinsing with 0.2% chlorhexidine, the tooth is absolutely isolated using a rubber dam and liquid dam (Opaldam- Ultradent, South-Jordan, Utah). The coronal part of the tooth is then disinfected with a cotton pellet soaked in 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Under an operating microscope, the caries is removed non-selectively, first with a diamond bur under water cooling, then with a steel bur inserted in a handpiece, moving from the periphery of the tooth towards the pulpal wall. The absence of caries on non-pulpal walls is confirmed by caries indicator (Sable Seek-Ultradent, South-Jordan, Utah). The pulp chamber is opened with a sterile diamond bur in a turbine with copious water cooling. After opening the pulp, different types of treatment are used depending on the extent of inflammation and caries. 1. Direct pulp capping: Pressure of a sterile cotton pellet soaked in 2.5% NaOCl is applied to the exposed pulp to achieve hemostasis. After the bleeding has stopped, the cavity is flushed with sterile saline and Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) or MTA is mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The patient is called back after 1 week, when the temporary restoration is removed and a final restoration is placed in the cavity, which may be a composite filling, inlay or crown, depending on the amount of remaining tooth material. This type of intervention is performed (1) if a healthy tooth with a normal pulp has suffered iatrogenic pulp exposure and the pulp tissue is surrounded by intact dentin tissue, and (2) when it is asymptomatic, or with reversible pulpitis symptoms after extra deep caries removal, there is no dentin chips are the pulp tissue, it is surrounded by healthy dentin, there is no evidence of necrosis in the pulp, and bleeding can be controlled within 5 minutes with a cotton pellet soaked in 2.5% NaOCl. Direct pulp capping will berejected if the patient has spontaneous pain before treatment, bleeding from the pulp is not controllable within 5 minutes, necrotic tissue is present in the pulp chamber, or if the pulp is explose through carious dentin. 2. Partial pulpotomy After opening of the pulp with a sterile diamond bur, an additional 2-3 mm of coronal pulp tissue is removed with copious water cooling. Subsequently, light pressure is applied to the pulp for 5 minutes with a cotton pellet dipped in 2.5% NaOCl to control bleeding. After controlling the bleeding, the cavity is flushed with sterile saline and Biodentine or MTA is applied the same way as in case of direct pulp capping. Partial pulpotomy is the treatment of choice in the following clinical situations: (1) in case of extra-deep caries the bacterial biofilm and infected dentin can be only removed by superficial pulp excision, (2) when further caries removal is required after pulp exposure due to the risk of infected dentin shavings entering the pulp, (3) in the case of normal pulp after extra-deep caries removal, bleeding cannot be controlled within 5 minutes after direct pulp capping attempt, (4) in the case of reversible pulpitis, if bleeding cannot be stopped within 5 minutes after pulp exposure. We exclude from partial pulpotomy treatment, for any of the above indications, cases where bleeding cannot be stopped within 5 minutes. 3. Complete pulpotomy During a total coronal pulpotomy, the coronal pulp tissue is removed down to the level of the orifices using a sterile diamond bur with copious water cooling. Bleeding is controlled by gentle pressure with a cotton pellet soaked in 2.5% NaOCl. When the bleeding stops, the cavity is flushed with sterile saline and Biodentine or MTA is applied the same way as in case of direct pulp capping. Complete pulpotomy is the treatment type of choice in the following clinical situations: (1) reversible pulpitis/normal pulp with anemic necrotic tissue in the pulp, (2) reversible pulpitis, normal pulp after partial pulpotomy if bleeding cannot be controlled in 5 minutes, (3) if the patient's complaints include spontaneous or persistent pain/night pain. Exclusion criteria for complete pulpotomy treatment include (1) bleeding uncontrollable in 5 minutes, or (2) anaemic/necrotic tissue at the level of the orifices. The patients will be consulted about any complaints or changes in complaints 7 days after the procedure, at the same time as the final restoration is made. If there are no previous complaints, the patient will be referred back for a follow-up examination six months after the procedure. Then, after recording any complaints, a control radiograph and clinical examination (inspection, palpation, palpation, periodontal pocket probing) are performed. The same is repeated 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4 years after treatment. Evaluation of the results: The success of the treatment is evaluated by combining the patient's subjective complaints with the results of the clinical examination and periapical radiograph. The periapical index (PAI) is used to assess the periapical space on radiographs.