The goal of this phase 3 non-inferiority trial is to compare the efficacy and toxicity of proton or photon radiation therapy plus carbon ion radiation therapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The main question it aims to answer is that if proton radiation therapy plus carbon ion radiation therapy is non-inferior to photon radiation therapy plus carbon ion radiation therapy in terms of therapeutic efficacy. Participants will be randomized to receive either proton radiation therapy (arm 1) or photon radiation therapy (arm 2), in addition to carbon ion radiation therapy (for both arms).
This is a phase 3 randomized non-inferiority trial. The primary objective of the trial is to compare progression-free survival between proton plus carbon ion radiation therapy (arm 1) and photon plus carbon ion radiation therapy (arm 2) for patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The secondary objectives includes overall survival, locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, physician-graded toxicities according to the CTCAE, and patients-reported outcomes. This study adopts a web-based central randomization system. The randomization method uses minimization, with two balancing factors: Stage (AJCC Staging System, 9th edition): Stage I vs. Stages II/III; Response to induction chemotherapy: No induction chemotherapy vs. sensitive (CR + PR) vs. resistant (SD + PD). Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the experimental group or the control group. This is an open-label study, meaning both patients and investigators are aware of the treatment allocation. Participants randomized to arm 1 will receive proton therapy with a dose of 56 GyRBE in 28 fractions, in addition to a boost delivered using carbon ion radiation therapy with a dose of 17.5 GyRBE in 5 fractions. Participants randomized to arm 2 will receive photon therapy with a dose of 56 Gy in 28 fractions, plus carbon ion radiation therapy with a dose of 17.5 GyRBE in 5 fractions. The treatment response will be evaluated according to the RECIST criteria. Induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy will be prescribed according to disease stage.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
470
Intensity-modulated proton therapy, will be delivered to the high risk area with a dose of 56 GyRBE in 28 fractions, and if applicable, to the low risk area with a dose of 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions.
Intensity-modulated photon therapy, will be delivered to the high risk area with a dose of 56 Gy in 28 fractions, and if applicable, to the low risk area with a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.
Intensity-modulated carbon ion radiation therapy will be delivered as a boost with a dose of 17.5 GyRBE in 5 fractions to gross tumor.
Concurrent chemotherapy will be administered on a weekly basis.
Cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy will be administered every three weekly.
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGProgression-free survival
Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time interval from randomization to death or disease progression whichever comes first.
Time frame: 3 years
Overall survival
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time interval from randomization to death.
Time frame: 3 years
Locoregional progression-free survival
Locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) is defined as the time interval from randomization to death or locoregional failure whichever comes first.
Time frame: 3 years
Distant metastasis-free survival
Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) is defined as the time interval from randomization to death or distant metastasis whichever comes first.
Time frame: 3 years
Prevalence of grade ≥2 acute toxicities
Prevalence of grade ≥2 acute toxicities graded by CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 3 years
Prevalence of grade ≥3 acute toxicities
Prevalence of grade ≥3 acute toxicities graded by CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 3 years
Prevalence of grade ≥2 late toxicities
Prevalence of grade ≥2 late toxicities graded by CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 3 years
Prevalence of grade ≥3 late toxicities
Prevalence of grade ≥3 late toxicities graded by CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 3 years
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy
Patient-reported outcome, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT).
Time frame: 3 years
Xerostomia Questionnaire
Patient-reported outcome, Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ).
Time frame: 3 years
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory
Patient-reported outcome, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MADI).
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.