Study on Orthosis in Cervical Spine Fracture Treatment

Overview

Background and Purpose: Neck fractures affect over 1,100 people in Sweden each year, with the majority being frail older adults. Most neck fractures are stable and therefore treated without surgery, typically using a rigid collar. However, the collar only limits neck movement by 40-50% and can cause pressure sores, as well as difficulties with swallowing and breathing. Because of these issues, the latest Swedish national guidelines for pre-hospital and hospital spinal motion restriction have replaced the rigid collar with other methods. This raises the question of whether the rigid collar still has a role in the modern treatment of stable neck fractures. The aim of this study is to determine whether treatment with or without a rigid collar leads to equally good healing outcomes. Method: All adults diagnosed with a stable neck fracture deemed suitable for non-surgical treatment will be included in the study at the time of registration in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Participating hospitals will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either use no collar at all or a rigid collar for 12 weeks. After an initial period of 1.5 years, the hospitals will switch to the opposite treatment group. A total of 616 participants are expected to be included within 3 years. At the one-year follow-up, investigators will evaluate how many participants in each treatment group that required a switch to surgical stabilization due to treatment failure. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, neck pain, and the need for assistive devices in relation to disability and complications in both groups. Summary: Non-surgical treatment rarely fails, and the need to switch from non-surgical treatment to surgery is very uncommon. The rigid collar is often prescribed out of habit, without much consideration for its potential negative effects. If this study shows that the rigid collar is unnecessary for treating stable neck fractures, frail older adults-who often struggle with collar-related discomfort, malnutrition, and pressure sores-could avoid unnecessary suffering.

The annual incidence rate of spinal fracture is 64 per 100,000 with a peak in young men and elderly women (1). Ten percent of all traumatic spinal fractures are located in the upper cervical spine and 20% in the subaxial cervical spine (2). Stable cervical spine fractures are treated non-surgically, with a rigid collar that is worn 24 hours a day for 12 weeks to limit neck movements and promote bone healing. However, rigid collars only restrict 40-50% of cervical spine motions (3, 4). The drawbacks with collar treatment are that the collar may be very uncomfortable, may cause pressure ulcer, or affect swallowing or breathing (5). Wearing a collar is associated with difficulties to perform activities of daily living due to the limited neck movement. Treatment without a collar would avoid the annoyance and potential harm, whilst the stable fracture may still heal. Investigators aim to compare the benefit versus the harm and discomfort of rigid collar treatment with treatment without a rigid collar, in a registry based randomized controlled trial. Treatment decisions may be made using a fracture classification such as the Subaxial injury classification and severity scale (SLICS) (6) or others. C1 and C2 fractures have separate classifications. In C1 fractures a lateral dislocation of \> 7 mm is classified as unstable and requires surgical fixation. In the elderly, C2 fractures are common, secondary to low energy trauma and are mostly regarded as stable (7). Cervical spine fractures are common enough to be a significant public health problem but too uncommon to perform a prospective study comparing the results of current treatments in a single institution. Quality registers are excellent alternatives to close these knowledge gaps. The Swedish fracture register (SFR) is a national register founded in 2011. Spinal fractures have been included since 2015, and the intra- and interrater reliability is acceptable (8). The diagnosing physician classifies the fracture with the help of drawings. Treatment, non-surgical, or surgical treatment is registered as well as treatment failure, non-surgical treatment converted to surgical stabilization and secondary surgery after failure of the primary surgery. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are sent to the participants shortly after the fracture occurrence (concerning status before the injury), and at one-year of follow-up. The PROMs include the European quality of life 5 dimensions 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) (9) and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) (10). In SFR the treatment failure on cervical spine fractures treated non-surgically is 4% and the most common cause of failure is patients with facet joint dislocation or anterior distraction with posterior compression (manuscript in preparation). However, facet joint dislocation and anterior distraction do not often fall within the recommendations of non-surgical treatment. Investigators consider it to be safe conducting this trial. Investigators expect essentially none of the participants assigned to non-surgical treatment with or without a rigid collar to face the risk of undergoing surgical treatment. In clinicaltrials.gov there are 3 registered trials on rigid collars; 1) The DENS trial comparing early removal versus 12 weeks treatment with a rigid collar in older frail adults with odontoid fractures (NCT04895644) (11), 2) A pilot efficacy trial comparing parathyroid hormone analog (PTH) together with a rigid collar versus historical treatment with rigid collar alone (NCT04760782), 3) A study about the length of rigid collar treatment, 6 versus 12 weeks (NCT02788760). Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) compare surgical versus non-surgical treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly (NCT03788200, NCT02789774). Considering the rigid collars limited effectiveness on spinal motion restriction and the potential harm they may afflict there is reason to explore the additional value of rigid collars in non-surgical treatment of stable cervical spine fractures, compared with no use of rigid collars.