(Effectiveness Aim 1) To test the comparative effectiveness of PreP for WINGS versus PrEP alone on primary outcomes of increasing PrEP initiation measured by self-report/medical records, recent adherence measured by urine assay of Tenofovir (TDF) and longer-term adherence by self-report/medical records over the 12-month follow-up; and secondary outcomes of decreasing IPV, hazardous drinking, recidivism, and HIV risks. (Moderation Aim 2) To test if the effectiveness of WINGS+PrEP on study outcomes is moderated by key participant subgroups based on race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, education, incarceration history, IPV severity, substance use disorders (SUDs), digital access and literacy, housing stability, and medical mistrust.
This hybrid type 1 Effectiveness and Implementation Trial will evaluate an m-Health syndemic intervention (PrEP for WINGS) that aims to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation and adherence among women in community supervision programs (CSPs) including probation, parole, and alternative-to-incarceration (ATI) programs) in New York City (NYC) who report hazardous drinking. PrEP is a proven effective biomedical strategy to prevent HIV infection. To date, however, very few PrEP interventions have focused on cis-gender women, and none have targeted women in CSPs, who due to racialized drug laws, are disproportionately Black and Latinx. Women in CSPs have high rates of HIV risk behaviors (e.g., frequent condomless sex, sex with multiple partners) and elevated rates of HIV infection as high as 17%. Large racial health disparities in PrEP uptake exist, a nationally representative study showing that Black women in the USA were four times less likely to have initiated PrEP than non-Hispanic white women. Advancing an effective PrEP intervention for women in CSPs holds promise for reducing HIV disparities by reaching a large number of Black and Latinx women who remain at high risk for HIV. Compared to the general population, women in CSPs have very high rates of co-occurring hazardous drinking and intimate partner violence (IPV), which are major syndemic drivers of HIV infection and well-established barriers to PrEP uptake. PrEP enables women to engage in a female-controlled HIV prevention strategy, which is vitally important within the context of hazardous drinking and violent partners. To date, however, there are no evidence-based syndemic-focused PrEP interventions for women that address hazardous drinking and IPV exposure. The PrEP for WINGS intervention is a 3-session syndemic-focused intervention that combines an evidence-based mHealth Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) tool, and an evidence-based mHealth IPV SBIRT tool - WINGS (Women Initiating New Goals of Safety) with an evidence-based PrEP intervention that includes a PrEP decision making aid with novel PrEP telemedicine and peer navigation components delivered by Community Health Advocates (CHA). Peer navigation has been shown to increase PrEP initiation and adherence and reduce barriers related to medical mistrust and stigma, which is important for Black and Latinx women. The same single session evidence-based PrEP intervention with peer navigation will serve as the comparison condition (PrEP alone), allowing us to compare the added value of the WINGS syndemic components and offering a cost-efficient alternative evidence-based PrEP intervention. Both interventions will be implemented at various community-based organizations supporting women in CSPs in NYC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
The PrEP for WINGS intervention involves three sessions of a self-paced and self-directed intervention delivered via a mobile health platform. Session 1 will focus on HIV risk reduction and provide the PrEP Decision Aid, where participants will learn information about PrEP to help them decide if it is appropriate for them. Sessions 2-3 will involve integrated Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) modules focused on IPV and alcohol reduction. The PrEP for WINGS intervention will also involve peer navigation sessions with Community Health Advocates to help intervention participants trouble shoot any barriers to achieving goals they set during the self-paced sessions. The PrEP for WINGS intervention will take place over a 30 day period and Sessions 2-3, and the peer navigation sessions may be delivered using smart phones or using tablets available at study data collection sites.
The PrEP Decision Aid will be delivered to participants in the control condition, and focus on helping study participants decide if they should initiate PrEP. This single session will focus on HIV risk reduction, and then launch the patient-centered PrEP Decision Aid. This individual session will be identical to the first session of the PrEP for WINGS three session intervention, and will also be delivered through an online survey platform. In addition, study participants in the control condition will also have one peer navigation session with a Community Health Advocate at the end of the self-paced session to help facilitate linkage to care.
Number of completed PrEP provider meetings (PrEP Initiation)
Meeting with a PrEP provider to start PrEP once will meet the threshold for PrEP initiation.
Time frame: From enrollment (baseline) to the end of 12-month follow up
Revised Conflict Tactic Scale Score
This is designed to assess intimate partner violence (IPV) based on self-reporting on quantitative behavioral survey assessments using the Revised Conflict Tactic Scale 2. Questions are asked for 21 behaviors occurring in the three time frames prior to assessment: ever, past year, and past six months. Positive endorsement of any item will be scored with 1; negative endorsements will be scored 0. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each timeframe, with low score indicated fewer episodes of IPV in the given timeframe, where higher scores indicate higher number of episodes of IPV.
Time frame: From enrollment (baseline) to the end of 12-month follow up
AUDIT Score
The self-report version of the AUDIT will be used to assess hazardous alcohol use. The AUDIT has 10 questions and the possible responses to each question are scored 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, with the exception of questions 9 and 10 which have possible responses of 0, 2 and 4. The range of possible scores is from 0 to 40 where 0 indicates an abstainer who has never had any problems from alcohol. A score of 1 to 7 suggests low-risk consumption according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Scores from 8 to 14 suggest hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption and a score of 15 or more indicates the likelihood of alcohol dependence (moderate-severe alcohol use disorder).
Time frame: From enrollment (baseline) to the end of 12-month follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.