CONTEXT : Obesity is a serious disease which affects 17% of the french population. Bariatric and metabolic surgery has demonstrated its efficiency and remains the treatment of reference. Over 40,000 bariatric procedures are performed per year, mainly by laparoscopy ; the robotic approach, historically developed by Intuitive Surgical increases rapidly and accounts for 18% of the procedures in the public system. Whereas the robotic approach has demonstrated its superiority toward laparoscopy for prostatectomies and rectal resections, it still has to be demonstrated for bariatric surgery ; some studies report a decrease rate of complications for complexe procedures and selected patients but the literature remains variable and the benefit of the robot in relation to its high cost must be confirmed. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a health-economic assessment (i.e. cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the additional cost per quality adjusted life-year gained) of the Da Vinci robot in bariatric surgery at 1 year, from the Health Care system point of view. METHOD : Randomized (482 patients), controlled, single-blind, multicenter, superiority trial comparing two approaches for primary or revisional bariatric surgery: a group benefiting from a robotic approach and a reference group benefiting from a laparoscopic approach. Data from the trial will be matched via the social security number to the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database) in order to collect care consumption. The quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire. PERSPECTIVES: This study will have a direct impact on patients care, professional practices and public health policy either by validating the value of the robot in bariatric surgery or conversely, by promoting the laparoscopic approach. HYPOTHESIS : Robot-assisted bariatric surgery is more expensive than conventional laparoscopy, but the additional costs associated with the robot are partly offset by a reduction in post-operative complications at 1 year, which should also help to improve patients' quality of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
482
Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. The robot used will be the Da Vinci X or Xi model (depending on the center) from the company Intuitive Surgical.
Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach
All patients will have pain evaluation with visual analog scale
All patients will have quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
All patients will have Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire
Département de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin Place Amélie Raba Léon 33076 BORDEAUX
Bordeaux, France
RECRUITINGDépartement de chirurgie digestive CHRU Dijon - Hôpital Le Bocage Bd du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 21000 DIJON
Dijon, France
RECRUITINGDigestive Surgery Department CHU Grenoble BP217 - 38043 GRENOBLE Cedex 09
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGService de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive Grand Hopital de l'Est Francilien Site de Marne La Vallée 2-4 Cours de la Gondoire 77600 JOSSIGNY
Incremental cost-effectivEness ratio (ICER)
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) calculated from: * Survival and quality of life data (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) * Cost data (micro-costing) and by individual matching with the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database)
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Number, type and severity of intraoperative complications
Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of intraoperative complications (during surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.
Time frame: End of the surgery
Number, type and severity of postoperative complications
Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of complications (within 1 year after surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Pain assessment
Pain will be assessed 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery, according to a visual analogic scale (VAS). The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 representing no pain and at the opposite end, 10 representing extreme pain
Time frame: 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery
Readmission rate
Number of patients readmitted within 1 year after surgery.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Reintervention rate
Number of patients for whom reintervention was necessary within 1 year after surgery.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
This questionnaire is divided into 2 parts: A first part with the questions called "EQ-5D descriptive system", representing 5 dimensions: Mobility, Personal autonomy, Current activities, Pain and discomfort, Anxiety and depression. The response is based on 5-point scales (1: no problem; 2: mild problems; 3: moderate problems; 4: severe problems; 5: extreme problems or total incapacity). This part is completed by a visual analog scale, called "EQ-5D VAS". It consists of a 20 cm line, graduated from 0 to 100, where the patient must indicate how they evaluate their current state of health, 0 being the worst possible state and 100 the best
Time frame: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire
This questionnaire includes five health concepts: mobility, self-esteem, social life, working conditions and sex life. Five answers will be offered to patients for each item and each answer will be assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5. The most pejorative score is 155.
Time frame: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Duration of surgery
Operative time expressed in minutes
Time frame: End of the surgery
Length of hospital stay
The Length of stay (in days) is based on the number of days of hospitalization from surgery (day of surgery = D0) until the day of discharge
Time frame: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
Readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit
Number of patients for whom readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit was necessary within 1 years after surgery.
Time frame: Within 12 months after surgery
Cost of the initial hospital stay
the cost of the initial surgical stay for each group will be calculated using the micro-costing method
Time frame: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
ICER in subgroup of patients with preoperative BMI < 50 versus patients with preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients age > 60 years old versus patients age < 60 years
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with primary surgery versus patients with revisional surgery
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with restrictive surgery versus patients with malabsorptive surgery
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER depending on preoperative risk
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Perform a budgeT impact analysis
Financial consequences of adopting robotic from the perspective of the French public health care system at 5 years
Time frame: 5-year modelling
Weight loss
Weight loss at 6 and 12 months expressed as an absolute value (aWL in kg), as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL; \[(Weight at each visit - initial weight) / (initial weight)\] × 100), as a percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL; \[(Weight at each visit - baseline weight) / (baseline weight - ideal weight)\] × 100); as a percentage of excess BMI loss (%BMI; \[(BMI at each visit - baseline BMI) / (baseline BMI - ideal BMI)\] × 100, using 25 as the ideal BMI).
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in treatment
Changes in treatment with antidiabetic, antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and gastro-oesophageal reflux medications
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Presence of sleep apnoea syndrome
Assessment of the presence of sleep apnoea syndrome 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Jossigny, France
Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne CHU de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez 1 rue Michel Polonovski 59000 LILLE
Lille, France
RECRUITINGHospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Edouard Herriot Chirurgie Digestive et Bariatrique 5 Place d'Arsonval - 69437 Lyon Cedex 03 - FRANCE
Lyon, France
RECRUITINGService de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, 6 rue Désirée Clary, 13003 MARSEILLE
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGDépartement de chirurgie digestive et bariatrique CHU de Nantes - Site Hôtel-Dieu - HME 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau 44000 NANTES
Nantes, France
RECRUITINGService de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation Hépatique, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, CHU de Nice
Nice, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGDépartement de Chirurgie digestive Hôpital de la Source CHU d'ORLEANS 14 Avenue de l'hôpital 45100 ORLEANS LA SOURCE
Orléans, France
RECRUITING...and 8 more locations