Evaluation of Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery in the T-tilted Position

Overview

To evaluate the effect of the T-tilted position on the stone-free rate compared to the standard lithotomy position in retrograde intrarenal surgeries. Common positions include the Trendelenburg position, where the patient is tilted head-down to help gravity move stones from the upper calyces to the renal pelvis, and the modified lateral decubitus position, which improves access to the lower renal poles. A more recent approach, the modified T-tilt position, combines a slight Trendelenburg tilt with lateral positioning, offering optimal access to both the upper and lower calyces while maintaining patient comfort

Retrograde intrarenal surgery is a minimally invasive technique for managing renal stones, especially those in the renal pelvis and calyces. It is the standard of care for renal stones less than 2 cm. Due to the new advancements in endoscopes, ureteral access sheaths, and laser devices,retrograde intra renal surgery has been successful in managing stones with larger sizes. The stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones smaller than 2 cm is generally high, with most studies reporting stone free ratio between 80% and 95%. Variations in stone free ratio can be attributed to factors such as stone composition, location, surgeon experience, intraoperative complications, type of laser and endoscopies Anatomical variations of the kidney especially The stone free ratio is mainly related to stone volume. The more the stone volume and greater risk of residual stones. suction sheath was developed to enhance the stone free ratio and lower incidence of residual fragments. Patients position was suggest to lower the postoperative residual rate. Common positions include the Trendelenburg position, where the patient is tilted head-down to help gravity move stones from the upper calyces to the renal pelvis, and the modified lateral decubitus position, which improves access to the lower renal poles. A more recent approach, the modified T-tilt position, combines a slight Trendelenburg tilt with lateral positioning, offering optimal access to both the upper and lower calyces while maintaining patient comfort. We aimed throughout our study to evaluate the impact of the T-tilted position on stone free rate in retrograde intra renal surgery using flexible suction sheath. METHODS This study aims to compare two patient positioning techniques during retrograde intrarenal surgery to assess their impact on the stone-free rate. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A (standard lithotomy position) and Group B (T-Tilt position). The allocation process will use sealed envelopes prepared by an independent third party to ensure unbiased distribution. Both patients and the research team, including data collectors and statisticians, will be blinded to the intervention type to minimize bias. The study will evaluate whether the T-Tilt position improves stone free rate compared to the traditional lithotomy position, potentially optimizing retrograde intra renal surgery outcomes. Surgical procedure The study will involve a consistent surgical approach to minimize variability. All procedures will be conducted under general anesthesia, with preoperative evaluation based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. Each patient will undergo cystourethroscopy, followed by selective catheterization with a 6F ureteric catheter. The main surgical procedure will be flexible ureteroscopy, performed according to the surgeon's standard technique, without special maneuvers like stone displacement. For patients with large stone burdens, an access sheath will be used to facilitate efficient stone removal. Stone characteristics, including size, location, and renal anatomy, will be recorded for analysis. At the end of the procedure, an endoscopic examination of the pelvicalyceal system will be performed to assess stone fragmentation and the presence of residual fragments or dust. This examination will be video-recorded for post-operative assessment. The primary outcome of the study will be the comparison of stone free rate between the two positioning groups, while secondary outcomes will include the evaluation of perioperative complications, operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and cost analysis.