Experiment 1: Utilizing a transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography/functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, the investigators aim to determine whether transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum can alter neural oscillations and blood flow changes in the prefrontal cortex. The investigators will recruit 80 healthy volunteers and 80 stroke patients with middle cerebral artery infarction, each meeting the inclusion criteria. Twenty healthy volunteers and twenty patients will be randomly selected to receive a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the cerebellar vermis. The investigators will record cerebellar transcranial evoked potentials (TEP) in the EEG to assess cerebellar cortical excitability and inhibition and evaluate individuals using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to analyze changes in prefrontal blood flow and brain networks. The other 40 healthy volunteers and 40 patients will receive a single-pulse TMS to the right or left cerebellum, and similar assessments will be made. The remaining 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients will receive a sham iTBS, with similar assessments. Experiment 2: Through a facial expression recognition task, this experiment aims to clarify the cerebellum's increased perception of negative emotions, thereby achieving a rebalance from "controlled" to "automatic" regulation of negative emotions, ultimately playing a role in "automatic" emotional adjustment. The 80 healthy volunteers from Experiment 1 will be equally divided into four groups based on stimulation site: the cerebellar vermis; the right cerebellum; the left cerebellum; the sham stimulation. Each group will perform the facial expression recognition task during the TMS stimulation. The investigators will collect functional near-infrared spectroscopy and task-based EEG data from the participants during stimulation while also recording their response times, accuracy rates, and completion conditions, including their tolerance of the experiment and any adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
The single-pulse TMS
Electroencephalogram
EEG power in the delta, theta, alpha, beta band: the power spectral density (PSD) in unit\^2/Hz Functional connectivity---Phase locking value (PLV): The value of PLV ranges from 0 to 1 Event related potentials in amplitude/μV
Time frame: Day 1
Functional near - infrared spectroscopy , fNIRS
Hemodynamic curve (HbO) in μM
Time frame: Day 1
Mini-mental state examination,MMSE
Mini-mental state examination,MMSE: A score of 27-30: normal; Score \< 27: cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Day 1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: The total score of the scale is 30 points, and the test result shows that the normal value is ≥26 points.
Time frame: Day 1
Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD
Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD: A total score of more than 35 May indicate severe depression.
Time frame: Day 1
Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA
Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA: The total score ≥29, may be severe anxiety; ≥21 points, there must be obvious anxiety; ≥14 points, definitely have anxiety; More than 7 points, may have anxiety; If the score is less than 7, there is no anxiety symptom
Time frame: Day 1
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS: Extreme depression: MADRS \>35; Major depression: MADRS \>30; Moderate depression: MADRS \>22; Mild depression: MADRS \>12; Remission stage: MADRS \<12.
Time frame: Day 1
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report, QIDS-SR16
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report, QIDS-SR16: The total score is calculated on a scale of 0 to 27, with higher scores being associated with higher levels of depression.
Time frame: Day 1
Response time
Recording their response times in seconds: The average reaction time of subjects in the facial expression recognition task to judge each facial expression picture.
Time frame: Day 1
Accuracy rates
Recording their accuracy rates in % during the task: The average correct rate at which subjects judged each expression picture in the facial expression recognition task.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.