ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the PK presentation method on nursing students' deep breathing and cough exercise skills and the students' level of satisfaction with this method. Design: The sample of the study consisted of students studying in the 2nd year of the Nursing Department of a foundation university and taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course (n=96). Experimental (n=48) and control (n=48) groups were determined using a randomization program. While the students in the experimental group were taught deep breathing and cough exercises with the PK presentation method, the control group was trained with a traditional Power Point presentation. As data collection tools, student information form, deep breathing and cough exercise skill checklist and Visual Analog Scale measurement tool were used to determine the level of satisfaction with the training method. Keywords: PechaKucha, Nursing students, respiratory exercise, satisfaction
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
96
Ability to apply deep breathing and cough exercise skills will be examined.
The level of satisfaction with the training provided will be determined with the PechaKucha presentation.
Eastern Mediterranean University
Mersin, Turkey (Türkiye)
Satisfaction level of Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills Training given with PechaKucha presentation method
Visual Analog Scale A visual analog scale was used to measure students' satisfaction levels with the given training method, where students can score between 1 and 10..
Time frame: 3 day
Effect of PechaKucha presentation method on Deep Breathing and cough exercise skills
The steps of the Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise were prepared in accordance with the literature. Expert opinions were obtained for the scope validity of the prepared checklist according to the Davis technique. According to this technique, expert opinions are graded in 4 stages; 1-"Not appropriate", 2-"Item needs to be brought into appropriate form", 3-"Appropriate but minor changes are required", 4-"Very appropriate". The number of experts who gave 3 and 4 points to all items in the scale is divided by the total number of experts who received opinions and the Scope Validity Index (CVI) is obtained. In order for the items to be evaluated as sufficient in terms of scope validity, the "Scope Validity Index" must be above 0.80 \[15\]. In this technique, opinions are obtained from at least 3 and at most 20 experts. In this direction, expert opinions were obtained from 9 faculty members specialized in the field of Fundamentals of Nursing for the scope validity of the checklist.
Time frame: 3 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.