Comparison of the Efficiency of Femur Nerve Block and Intravenous Analgesia Treatment in Hip Fracture Patients

Overview

It is well-established that hip fractures impose a significant medical, socioeconomic, and financial burden. In the elderly population, the associated mortality and morbidity are particularly pronounced: within one year following a hip fracture, mortality rates range from 20% to 30%; approximately one-third of patients require an elevated level of care, and only 30-40% retain the potential to fully recover and regain their pre-injury functional status. Consequently, strategies to enhance early outcomes in these patients are urgently needed. Reducing preoperative pain has been shown to improve patient satisfaction, facilitate the timing and effectiveness of physical therapy, shorten hospital stays, and support long-term functional recovery. Perioperative nerve blockade has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to systemic analgesia, traction, neurostimulation, and alternative medicine approaches. The advantages of peripheral nerve blocks include reduced pain scores, decreased opioid consumption, a lower risk of pneumonia, shorter time to ambulation, diminished postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and a more cost-effective analgesic regimen. This study seeks to evaluate the effects of femoral nerve block (FNB) on common hip fracture types within a trauma patient population. Specifically, we compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided, single-injection femoral nerve block against prevalent hip fracture types prior to surgery, assessing outcomes longitudinally through changes in pain scores and opioid requirements.

Hip fractures constitute a significant medical and socioeconomic challenge, particularly among elderly populations. Epidemiological projections estimate a marked rise in the global incidence of hip fractures, with approximately 6.26 million cases anticipated by 2050. These injuries are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with one-year post-fracture mortality rates ranging from 20% to 30%. Furthermore, only 30% to 40% of survivors recover their pre-injury functional capacity, and many require long-term care, underscoring the profound impact of these injuries. Effective pain management is pivotal in optimizing early outcomes for patients with hip fractures. Adequate analgesia not only enhances patient comfort but also facilitates the initiation of physical therapy, shortens hospital stays, and supports improved long-term functional recovery. Various pain control strategies, including systemic analgesia, traction, neurostimulation, and alternative therapies, have been employed. However, perioperative nerve blockade has demonstrated superior efficacy and broader patient benefits. Peripheral nerve blocks, such as the femoral nerve block (FNB), offer notable advantages, including reduced pain scores, decreased opioid consumption, lower incidence of pneumonia, enhanced mobilization, diminished risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and reduced costs associated with analgesic regimens. This randomized controlled trial seeks to evaluate the comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided, single-injection femoral nerve block versus intravenous fentanyl for pain management in patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures in the emergency department. The study cohort comprises adult patients diagnosed with hip fractures-specifically femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures-confirmed through radiological imaging. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine or intravenous fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg. Pain levels will be assessed using the standardized Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes post-intervention. For patients with cognitive impairment, the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale will serve as an alternative evaluation tool. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, length of stay in the emergency department, and adverse effects associated with each analgesic modality. The study employs a double-blind methodology, ensuring that both participants and assessing clinicians remain unaware of treatment allocation. To maintain blinding, all participants will undergo two procedures: one active intervention and one placebo. In the intravenous fentanyl group, a placebo femoral block will be administered using 20 mL of normal saline, while in the FNB group, a placebo intravenous infusion (100 mL of normal saline) will be provided. This design minimizes bias in the assessment of efficacy and adverse effects. The findings of this study are expected to inform the optimization of acute pain management strategies in emergency settings, potentially reducing opioid reliance, enhancing patient mobility, and improving overall clinical outcomes. By comparing these two analgesic approaches, this trial aims to identify the most effective and practical pain relief strategy for hip fracture patients prior to surgical intervention.