The hypotheses to be tested are 1) Fiber supplementation will decrease the need for medication in patients with gestational diabetes, and 2) Fiber supplementation will decrease adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in these patients. In this study, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to limit bias in evaluating these hypotheses.
The study team proposes a randomized controlled trial of women with singleton pregnancies who present with a new diagnosis of diet-controlled gestational diabetes (previously referred to as GDMA1). The participants will be randomized to the intervention group (fiber supplementation) or control group (no fiber supplementation) in 1:1 fashion. The participant will be randomized by a number-generating computer software after recruitment at the new gestational diabetes education class.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
Psyllium fiber supplement capsules, 2g soluble fiber per capsule. They will be instructed to take 4 capsules twice daily for a total of 16g supplemental soluble fiber per day. This will be continued throughout pregnancy.
Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at ODU
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
RECRUITINGNumber of Participants with Need for GDM Medication
The primary outcome is the need for medication (either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents) for management of gestational diabetes (progression from GDMA1 to GDMA2). We chose this primary outcome because the need for medication is associated with the need for significantly more antenatal interventions due to increased adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Hgb A1c at delivery
Measurement of Hgb A1c
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Fetal Demise
Rate of fetal demise
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of documented occurrence (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction
Number of participants diagnosed with fetal growth restriction
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Preeclampsia
Number of participants diagnosed with preeclampsia
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants with Placental Abruption
Number of participants with placental abruption
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Mode of Delivery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rates of cesarean and vaginal deliveries
Time frame: At delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Rates of each indication for cesarean delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Shoulder Dystocia
Rate of shoulder dystocia
Time frame: At delivery
Quantitative Blood Loss
Blood loss in mL
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Rates of patients with quantitative blood loss \> 1000mL
Time frame: At delivery
Rates of Infection
Rates of infection
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Birth Weight
Birth weight
Time frame: At delivery
Apgar Score
Apgar scores at delivery on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores meaning a better outcome
Time frame: At delivery
Rates of Neonatal Infections
Rates of neonatal infections
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Rate of respiratory distress syndrome
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Rate of necrotizing enterocolitis
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of NICU Admission
Rate of admission to NICU
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Days in NICU
Days spent in NICU
Time frame: Delivery until discharge of the neonate (assessed up to 180 days)