Aim: This study investigates the impact of an AI-supported occupational therapy program, developed using the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO), on handwriting skills in children at risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 42 children aged 8-12 years, identified as being at risk for DCD using the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ). Participants were randomized into an intervention group (n=21) and a control group (n=21). The intervention group received an AI-supported occupational therapy program twice weekly for 8 weeks. Handwriting performance was assessed pre- and post-intervention using the Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA). Keywords: artificial intelligence, occupational
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
42
The AI-supported occupational therapy program was individually implemented by an occupational therapist over 8 weeks, with 2 sessions per week, each lasting 45 minutes. A touchscreen tablet, touch pen, and external camera were utilized during the sessions. At the beginning of the program, technological devices and artificial intelligence tools were introduced to the children. For the goals and detailed intervention program of the 8-week schedule
Güleser Güney Yılmaz
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Minnesota Handwriting Assessment
(MHA) assesses six categories of handwriting, including legibility, form, alignment, size, spacing and writing speed. The MHA consists of words that include all letters of the Turkish alphabet at least once and consist of 34 letters in total, and can be understood by children at the primary school level 23. In the test application, children copy this word sequence written on the paper to the marked line immediately below. In the scoring phase, the length of 1/16 inch (0.15 cm) is taken as a basis and all deviations, proportions between letters and within letters are evaluated by measuring this length with a ruler. The lowest score in each category of the MHA is 0 and the highest score is 34 24.
Time frame: Two assessments, one week before the intervention and one week after the intervention was completed
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.