The purpose of the study is to learn about the safety and effects of the study medicine (called ritlecitinib) for the treatment of alopecia areata. Alopecia areata is a disease that causes hair loss on the scalp, face, and areas of the body. Ritlecitinib is approved in many countries at a dose of 50 mg (milligram) taken by mouth once a day for the treatment of patients 12 years and older with severe alopecia areata. This study will look at both the 50 mg dose and a 100 mg dose. This study is seeking participants who: * Are 12 years of age or older (Part 1) * Are 12 to less than 18 years (Part 2) * Have a diagnosis of alopecia areata * Have lost 50% or more of the hair on their scalp * Do not have any other conditions that causes hair loss * Are willing to stop all other treatments that they may be taking for alopecia areata About 550 participants will take part in Part 1 of this study. About 80 participants will take part in Part 2 of this study. In Part 1, participants will be chosen by chance, like drawing names out of a hat, to receive 1 of 2 different amounts of ritlecitinib (50 mg and 100 mg) taken by mouth once daily. The 2 doses of ritlecitinib in this study will be compared to each other and also to data from previous studies. This will help to see if the 100 mg dose of ritlecitinib is safe and effective. In Part 2, all eligible participants will receive ritlecitinib 100 mg taken by mouth once daily. The data from this part of the study will be combined with the data from Part 1 of the study to help to see if the 100 mg dose of ritlecitinib is safe and effective in adolescent patients with alopecia areata. People will be in this study for about 13 months. During the study, participants will need to visit the study site up to 9 times. Participants will undergo various tests and procedures such as: * alopecia areata assessment, * physical examinations, * hearing tests, * blood tests, * x-ray, * ECG (electrocardiogram), * photographs of the scalp and eyes (Part 1 only). Participants will also be asked to complete questionnaires about their alopecia areata.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
674
100 mg Capsule
50 mg Capsule
Capsule (to match Ritlecitinib 100 mg)
Capsule (to match Ritlecitinib 50 mg)
The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Radiology)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Faculty Office Towers (Regulatory)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGBurke Pharmaceutical Research
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score less than or equal to 20
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg once-daily (QD) versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 2: Percentage of participants with TEAEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation
Percentage of participants with events, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)
Part 2: Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: EU Only: Percentage of participants with Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"
Difference in percentage of participants with PGI-C response between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: US Only: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 36
Part 1: Change from baseline in SALT score
Difference in the mean absolute change from baseline in SALT score between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score equal to 0 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score equal to 0 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Change from baseline in SALT score
Difference in the mean absolute change from baseline in SALT score between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with EBA (Eyebrow Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)
Difference in the percentage of participants with EBA response (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with ELA (Eyelash Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)
Difference in the percentage of participants with ELA response (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with PGI-C response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"
Difference in the percentage of participants with PGI-C response between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with EBA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)
Difference in the percentage of participants with EBA response (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with ELA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)
Difference in the percentage of participants with ELA response (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
Time frame: Week 24
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 50 mg non-responder (NR)--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Week 48
Part 1: Change from Week 24 in SALT score
Difference in the mean absolute change from Week 24 in SALT score between ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with PGI-C response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"
Percentage of participants with PGI-C response between ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Time frame: Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg responder (R)--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10
Percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0
Percentage of participants with SALT score equal to 0 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Change from Week 24 in SALT score
Mean absolute change from Week 24 in SALT score for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with EBA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)
Percentage of participants with EBA response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with ELA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)
Percentage of participants with ELA response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with PGI-C response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"
Percentage of participants with PGI-C response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg R--\>50 mg QD, ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>50 mg QD, and ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>100 mg QD
Time frame: Week 24 through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20
Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10
Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0
Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0 for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Change from baseline in SALT score
Mean change from baseline in SALT score for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with EBA (Eyebrow Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)
Percentage of participants with EBA response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with ELA (Eyelash Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)
Percentage of participants with ELA response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 2: Percentage of participants with PGI-C response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"
Percentage of participants with PGI-C response for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
Time frame: Baseline through Week 48
Part 1: Percentage of participants with TEAEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation
Percentage of participants with events, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD and ritlecitinib 50 mg
Time frame: Baseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)
Part 1: Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD and ritlecitinib 50 mg
Time frame: Baseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Doc1 Healthcare Systems
Brea, California, United States
RECRUITINGCalifornia Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
Encinitas, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGMarvel Clinical Research
Huntington Beach, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGUniversity of California - Irvine
Irvine, California, United States
RECRUITINGGavin Herbert Eye Institute
Irvine, California, United States
RECRUITINGSouthern California Clinical Research
Santa Ana, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING...and 136 more locations