Assessing Functional Outcomes and User Experience of the Lexie B3 Pro Powered by Bose Over-the-counter Self-Fitting Hearing Aid

Overview

Hearing loss significantly impacts quality of life, with sensorineural hearing loss being the most common type among adults. Hearing aids are a well-established intervention, yet barriers such as access and affordability limit their adoption, even in countries with developed audiological services . Despite their proven benefits, many individuals who could benefit from hearing aids do not obtain them. Traditionally, hearing aids required professional consultations, which created access challenges. In 2022, the U.S. FDA approved over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, including self-fitting devices, to improve accessibility. Recent clinical trials suggest that OTC hearing aids can provide similar benefits to professionally fitted ones in speech recognition and self-reported outcomes. One critique of past studies is that they often compare OTC hearing aids to audiologist-fitted devices using the same hardware, with differences primarily in programming methods. While much research has focused on fitting methods, this study aims to evaluate a new OTC hearing aid with its proprietary fitting algorithm against a marketed competitor. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) forms part of a larger validation study that follows a phased approach. Phase 1 validates an in-situ hearing test against a standard audiometer and Phase 2 assesses user experience. This RCT (Phase 3) will compare two OTC devices-the Lexie B3 Pro and a competitor already on the market-to evaluate self-reported benefit, user experience, and satisfaction. The hypothesis is that both devices provide comparable outcomes.

Hearing loss is a prevalent global health concern with significant social, emotional, and economic consequences. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common type among adults, often resulting from aging, noise exposure, or ototoxic medication. Left untreated, hearing loss can lead to communication difficulties, social isolation, depression, cognitive decline, and reduced quality of life. Hearing aids are the most widely used intervention for addressing hearing impairment, offering substantial benefits in speech perception, communication, and overall well-being. However, despite the well-documented advantages of hearing aids, adoption rates remain low across various populations. Barriers to hearing aid adoption include cost, accessibility, stigma, and the traditional requirement for professional fitting. In many countries, hearing aids are expensive, and access to hearing healthcare professionals is limited, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Even in regions with well-established audiological services, individuals may face challenges such as lengthy appointment wait times, insurance limitations, or the perception that hearing aids are not necessary until hearing loss is severe. To address accessibility challenges, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced regulations in 2022 allowing the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. These devices are designed for adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss and can be purchased without the need for a professional hearing assessment or fitting. OTC hearing aids aim to lower barriers by providing a more affordable, convenient, and consumer-driven option. Among OTC hearing aids, self-fitting models offer additional benefits, as users can fine-tune their settings using built-in hearing tests or app-based adjustments, potentially achieving outcomes comparable to those of audiologist-fitted hearing aids. Emerging research suggests that OTC hearing aids can be effective in improving speech recognition and self-reported hearing outcomes, with some studies indicating that self-fitting devices perform similarly to traditional, professionally fitted hearing aids. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the best methods for fitting and personalizing these devices. Previous research has often compared OTC hearing aid fitting methods to audiologist fittings using the same hardware, with the primary difference being the programming approach rather than the device itself. This approach has drawn criticism because it does not fully reflect real-world consumer decisions, where individuals must choose between different OTC models with varying features, fitting algorithms, and user interfaces. This study aims to address this gap by directly comparing two distinct OTC hearing aids: the Lexie B3 Pro, which features a proprietary self-fitting algorithm, and a competing marketed device. The goal is to assess whether both devices offer comparable outcomes in terms of self-reported benefit, user experience, and satisfaction.