This is a randomized Phase II/late phase I de-escalation clinical trial with approved investigational medicinal products in new use condition, low intervention. Disease under study Patients with unresectable or metastatic, slowly progressive, well-differentiated (Grade1 and Grade2), somatostatin receptor-positive midgut neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). It is planned to randomize 166 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of slowly progressive grade 1 or grade 2 advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) candidates to receive 177Lu-Dotatate targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). Patients are required to have SSTR+ disease, as evidenced on somatostatin receptor imaging. Patients will be randomized into two arms: 1. control arm: regimen 177Lu-Dotatate every 8 weeks (q8w) 2. experimental arm: regimen 177Lu-Dotatate every 16 weeks (q16w) Research hypothesis: Less intensive somatostatin-receptor (SST) targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) (7.4 GBq/cycle 177Lu-Dotatate every 16 weeks x 4 cycles) is associated with less severe hematological toxicities and may mitigate the risk to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) with similar antitumor efficacy in slowly growing gastrointestinal grade 1-2 NETs.
1. Rationale The main hypothesis is less intensive somatostatin-receptor (SST) targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) (7.4 GBq/cycle 177Lu-Dotatate every 16 weeks x 4 cycles) is associated with less severe hematological toxicities and may mitigate the risk to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) with similar antitumor efficacy in slowly growing gastrointestinal grade 1-2 NETs. 2. Objectives Primary Objectives -To demonstrate decreased serious hematological toxicity with a less intensive RLT regimen in slowly progressive advanced Grade 1-2 midgut NETs. Secondary Objectives * To show comparable efficacy (clinical, hormonal and radiological response, progression-free survival and overall survival) of the less intensive RLT regimen (cycles q16w) versus the conventional one (cycles q8w). To compare the rate of clonal hematopoiesis among study arms (baseline and post-treatment) and assess its potential value to predict the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN). * To compare the duration of ≥ Grade 2 hematological toxicity (median and percentage rate of \> 6 month duration) * To show decreased overall toxicity of the less intensive RLT regimen (cycles q16w) versus the conventional one (cycles q8w) Exploratory Objectives * To explore other predictive factors for toxicity and efficacy * To explore the tolerance of the subsequent systemic line of treatment Pattern of progression and modality of diagnosis 3. Main Trial Endpoints The primary endpoint for the RIALTO trial is the rate of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity (worst per patient) from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months thereafter according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI-CTCAE v5) 4. Secondary Trial Endpoints * Best hormonal response * Best radiological response * Duration of response (DoR) * Objective response rate (ORR) * Disease control rate (DCR) * Progression-free survival (PFS) (investigator assessed) * Overall survival (date of randomization to death from any cause) * Worst grade non-hematological toxicity per patient * Rate of clonal hematopoiesis by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA * Number of RLT cycles and cumulative dose received * Treatment compliance analyzing treatment delays and interruptions due to toxicity, rate of patients completing planned schedule, time from first to last RLT dose * Rate of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity (worst per patient) from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 3, 6 or 12 months after the last PRRT * PFS will also be centrally assessed based only on morphological imaging (CT/MRI scans), regardless of SRI-PET scan results. * PFS will also be centrally assessed based on both morphological (CT/MRI scans) and functional imaging. * PFS will also be assessed based only on morphological imaging (CT/MRI scans), functional imaging and clinically progression of the functional syndrome, defined as unequivocal worsening of the functioning syndrome at the investigator criteria Secondary Safety endpoints * Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE). * Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). * Patients reported outcomes through the EORTC QLQ-C30 and GINET21 questionnaires. * Rate of myeloid neoplasms * Incidence of severe infection/sepsis (antibiotics prescription, hospitalization) * Duration of adverse events ≥ Grade 2 * Rate of adverse events ≥ Grade 2 under subsequent next line of systemic treatment Exploratory endpoints * Correlation between clinical factors, radiomics and molecular determinants and toxicity/efficacy of 177Lu-Dotatate using mathematical models including artificial intelligence algorithms. * Tolerance of the subsequent systemic line of treatment * Pattern of progression (mesenteric, peritoneum, bone vs others) and modality of diagnosis 5. Trial Design RIALTO is an a randomized, prospective, international, open-label, phase III - I trial comparing a less intensive RLT regimen 4 cycles of 177Lu-Dotatate (7·4 GBq/cycle) every 16 weeks) versus the conventional one (4 cycles of 177Lu-Dotatate (7·4 GBq/cycle) every 8 weeks) 6. Trial Population It is planned to randomize 166 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of slowly progressive grade 1 or grade 2 advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) candidates to receive 177Lu-Dotatate targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). Patients are required to have SSTR+ disease, as evidenced on somatostatin receptor imaging. Patients with a large SRI+ mesenteric mass with abdominal-dominant disease judged by the investigator to be a midgut NET will also be eligible. Patients will be randomized into two arms: control (regimen 177Lu-Dotatate every 8 weeks) and experimental (regimen 177Lu-Dotatate every 16 weeks). 7. Study Treatments Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to experimental or control arms respectively: Experimental arm: 1. Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate (7.4 Gigabecquerel/cycle) during 30 min intravenous infusion every 16 weeks (q16w) x 4 cycles 2. Renal protection starting 30 minutes before targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) lasting 4 hours (iv amino acid solution of 14.4-20g of lysine and 14.9-20.7g of arginine in 1 to 2 liters of solution) 3. Long-acting standard doses of SSA (Lanreotide autogel 120 mg subcutaneous or Octreotide LAR 30 mg intramuscular, starting 24h after RLT every 4 weeks during RLT (q16w interval SSA administration should be adjusted to RLT administrations so that SSA is always given 24h after each RLT dose and at least 4 weeks prior to next RLT administration cycle) and q4w following last RLT administration until disease progression. Control arm: 1. Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate (7.4 Gigabecquerel/cycle) during 30 min intravenous infusion every 8 weeks (q8w) x 4 cycles 2. Renal protection starting 30 minutes before targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) lasting 4 hours (iv amino acid solution of 14.4-20g of lysine and 14.9-20.7g of arginine in 1 to 2 liters of solution); 3. Long-acting standard doses of SSA (Lanreotide autogel 120 mg subcutaneous or Octreotide LAR 30 mg intramuscular, starting 24h after RLT every 4 weeks during RLT (q8w interval SSA administration should be adjusted to RLT administrations so that SSA is always given 24h after each RLT dose and at least 4 weeks prior to next RLT administration cycle) and q4w following last RLT administration until disease progression 8\. Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 updated to its latest version Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. With the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards issued by the Working Party on Medicinal Product Efficacy of the European Economic Community (1990) (CPMP / ICH / 135/95).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
166
Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate (7.4 Gigabecquerel/cycle) during 30 min intravenous infusion every 16 weeks 177Lu-Dotatate, a radiopharmaceutical medicine which is an somatostatin analogue derived from octreotide that complexes via DOTA with non-carrier added (n.c.a) 177Lu radioconjugate. 177Lu-Dotatate will be supplied as a 370 MBq/mL solution for infusion. One mL of solution contains 370 MBq The total amount of radioactivity per single-dose vial is 7 400 MBq at the date and time of infusion. Given the fixed volumetric activity of 370 MBq/mL at the date and time of calibration, the volume of the solution in the vial ranges between 20.5 and 25.0 mL in order to provide the required amount of radioactivity at the date and time of infusion of lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide at the date and time of calibration.
Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate (7.4 Gigabecquerel/cycle) during 30 min intravenous infusion every 8 weeks (q8w) x 4 cycles 177Lu-Dotatate, a radiopharmaceutical medicine which is an somatostatin analogue derived from octreotide that complexes via DOTA with non-carrier added (n.c.a) 177Lu radioconjugate. Synonyms are: 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr 3-Octreotate, 177Lu-DOTATE LUTATHERA, lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide 177Lu-Dotatate will be supplied as a 370 MBq/mL solution for infusion One mL of solution contains 370 MBq The total amount of radioactivity per single-dose vial is 7 400 MBq at the date and time of infusion. Given the fixed volumetric activity of 370 MBq/mL at the date and time of calibration, the volume of the solution in the vial ranges between 20.5 and 25.0 mL in order to provide the required amount of radioactivity at the date and time of infusion of lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide at the date and time of calibration.
Renal protection starting 30 minutes before RLT and lasting 4 hours (iv) amino acid solution of 14.4-20 g of lysine and 14.9-20.7 g of arginine in 1 to 2 liters of solution)
Long-acting standard doses of SSA (Lanreotide autogel 120 mg subcutaneous (sc) or Octreotide LAR 30 mg im, starting 24h after RLT and every 4 weeks during RLT (q16w interval SSA administration should be adjusted to RLT administrations so that SSA is always given 24h after each RLT dose and at least 4 weeks prior to next RLT administration cycle) and q4w following last RLT administration until disease progression.
Centre François BACLESSE
Caen, Caen, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGChu Dijon
Dijon, Dijon, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Center University De Lille
Lille, Lille, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospices civiles de Lyon
Lyon, Lyon, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInstitut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, Marseille, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHopital BEAUJON
Clichy, Paris, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHopital COCHIN
Paris, Paris, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCentre Eugène MARQUIS
Rennes, Rennes, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, Balearic Islands, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITING...and 11 more locations
Rate of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity
The primary endpoint for the RIALTO trial is the frequency of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity (worst per patient) from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months thereafter according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI-CTCAE v5)
Time frame: Throughout the study period, from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months
Best hormonal response
Best hormonal response defined as greatest decrease, or \>30% decrease, of chromogranin A and 5HIAA from baseline if baseline levels were \>2x ULN or 5xULN
Time frame: 24 months
Best radiological response
Best radiological response according to local investigator RECIST V1.1
Time frame: 24 months
Duration of response (DoR)
Duration of response (DoR) according to local investigator RECIST v1.1. Time from first response (CR or PR), according to ORR definition for the trial, to the date of the documented PD as determined using RECIST v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Those patients with response and without PD or death event will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months
Objective response rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) according to local investigator RECIST v1.1. Assessed by the investigator through imaging follow-up (CT scan/MRI) using RECIST v1.1 (Appendix 3). This will be considered as the percentage/proportion of randomized patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their overall best response throughout the study period. The investigator will report the change in size of tumors as compared with baseline, before the first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months
Disease control rate (DCR)
Disease control rate (DCR) RECIST v1.1 according to local investigator RECIST v1.1. Assessed by the investigator through imaging follow-up (CT scan/MRI) using RECIST v1.1. This will be considered as the percentage/proportion of randomized patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their overall best response throughout the study period. The investigator will report the change in size of tumors as compared with baseline, before the first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 24 months
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS) (investigator assessed) defined as the time between randomization date and disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause (primary analysis of PFS) .PFS will be censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event is observed prior to the analysis cut-off date.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 3 months from radomization
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS) (investigator assessed) defined as the time between randomization date and disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause (primary analysis of PFS). PFS will be censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event is observed prior to the analysis cut-off date.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 12 months from radomization
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS) (investigator assessed) defined as the time between randomization date and disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause (primary analysis of PFS) .PFS will be censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event is observed prior to the analysis cut-off date.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 months from radomization
Overall survival
Overall survival defined as the time elapsed from randomization until death from any cause. Patients alive and free of events at the date of the analysis will be censored at their last known contact.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 6 months from radomization
Overall survival
Overall survival defined as the time elapsed from randomization until death from any cause. Patients alive and free of events at the date of the analysis will be censored at their last known contact.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 12 months from radomization
Overall survival
Overall survival defined as the time elapsed from randomization until death from any cause. Patients alive and free of events at the date of the analysis will be censored at their last known contact.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 18 months from radomization
Overall survival
Overall survival defined as the time elapsed from randomization until death from any cause. Patients alive and free of events at the date of the analysis will be censored at their last known contact.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 months from radomitation
Worst grade non-hematological toxicity per patient
Percentage of patients with Non-hematological toxicity. Non-hematological toxicity: defined as worst grade non-hematological toxicity per patient according to NCI-CTCAE v 5.0 criteria.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 months
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA calculated by mutations frequency in ctDNA samples
Time frame: Throughout the study period, at baseline
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA calculated by mutations frequency in ctDNA
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 3 months from the start of treatment of the study
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA calculated by mutations frequency in ctDNA samples
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 12 months from the start of treatment of the study
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis
Rate of clonal hematopoiesis by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA calculated by mutations frequency in ctDNA samples.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 months from the start of treatment of the study
Number of RLT cycles per patient
Number of RLT cycles per patient
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 month
Acumulative dose received each patient
Number acumulative dose received each patient
Time frame: Throughout the study period up to 24 month
Treatment compliance analyzing treatment delays and interruptions due to toxicity
Treatment compliance analyzing treatment delays and interruptions due to toxicity, rate of patients completing planned schedule, time from first to last RLT dose
Time frame: Throughout the study period, time from first to last RLT dose
Rate of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity (worst per patient)
Rate of Grade 2-5 hematological toxicity (worst per patient) from initiation of treatment with RLT up to 12 months after the last PRRT
Time frame: Throughout the study period, from initiation of treatment with RLT up to12 months after the last PRRT
PFS centralized based only on morphological imaging
PFS will also be centrally assessed according to RECIST 1.1 based only on morphological imaging (CT/MRI scans), regardless of SRI-PET scan results.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 mounth from radomization
PFS will also be centralized on both morphological and functional imaging.
Progression-free survival will also be centrally assessed according to RECIST 1.1 based on both morphological (CT/MRI scans) and functional imaging.
Time frame: Throughout the study period up to 24 mounth from radomization
PFS will also be assessed according to RECIST 1.1 based only on morphological imaging, functional imaging and clinically progression of the functional syndrome
PFS will also be assessed according to RECIST 1.1 based only on morphological imaging (CT/MRI scans), functional imaging and clinically progression of the functional syndrome, defined as unequivocal worsening of the functioning syndrome at the investigator criteria
Time frame: Throughout the study period, up to 24 mounth from radomization
Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE).
Number patients that suffered a Adverse event (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE) specific
Time frame: Throughout the study period. 24 months
Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).
Number Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).
Time frame: Throughout the study period, 24 month
Patients reported outcomes through the EORTC QLQ-C30 and GINET21 questionnaires.
Patients reported outcomes through the EORTC QLQ-C30 and GINET21 questionnaires.
Time frame: Throughout the study period, 24 months
Rate of myeloid neoplasms
Porcentatge patients with myeloid neoplasms
Time frame: Throughout the study period
Incidence of severe infection/sepsis
Incidence of severe infection/sepsis (antibiotics prescription, hospitalization)
Time frame: Throughout the study period
Rate of adverse events ≥ Grade 2
Rate of adverse events ≥ Grade 2 under subsequent next line of systemic treatment
Time frame: Throughout the study period
Duration of adverse events ≥ Grade 2
Duration of adverse events ≥ Grade 2 (median, %\>6 months)
Time frame: Throughout the study period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.