The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the mobile health (mHealth)-assisted, person-centred care (PCC) self-care support programme for homebound older adults. The researcher will compare PCC approach to a conventional care provider-led model. Participants (n = 130) will receive the intervention of six bi-weekly WhatsApp video call sessions over three months with nurse case managers (NCMs).
This hybrid effectiveness-implementation, cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluates a mHealth-assisted, PCC self-care support programme for homebound older adults in Hong Kong. Participants (n = 130) receive six bi-weekly WhatsApp video call sessions with NCMs over three months. The study compares a PCC-based approach with a conventional provider-led model. Effectiveness outcomes include self-efficacy, functional independence, and psychosocial well-being. Implementation is assessed using the RE-AIM framework. Findings will inform scalable, digital health interventions for aging populations, improving functional independence, self-care engagement, and healthcare accessibility for homebound older adults.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
130
Participants receive six bi-weekly WhatsApp video call sessions with a NCM over three months, using a person-centred care (PCC) approach.
Participants receive six bi-weekly WhatsApp video call sessions with a NCM over three months, based on the conventional provider-led model.
Yan Oi Tong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGChange in self-efficacy assessed using the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale
Unit of Measure: Mean score on self-efficacy.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in instrumental activities of daily living assessed using the Chinese version of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
Unit of Measure: Mean score on instrumental activities of daily living.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in quality of life assessed using the Chinese version of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2
Unit of Measure: Mean score on quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in psychological distress assessed using the Chinese version of 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
Unit of Measure: Mean score on psychological distress.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in perceived loneliness assessed using the Chinese version of the UCLA 3-item Loneliness Scale
Unit of Measure: Mean score on perceived loneliness.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in functional mobility assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test
Unit of Measure: Time in seconds.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in sedentary behaviour assessed using the Chinese version of the Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire for Elderly
Unit of Measure: Mean hours per day.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Change in frequency of healthcare utilization assessed using the self-reported healthcare utilization survey
Unit of Measure: Number of visits.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months post-intervention , and 6 months post-intervention.
Participant reach and recruitment success measured by recruitment records
Unit of Measure: Percentage of eligible enrollment.
Time frame: At baseline.
Participant satisfaction with the intervention assessed using the Chinese version of four-dimension Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Unit of Measure: Mean score on satisfaction.
Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention.
Service provider acceptability and adoption of person-centred care approach measured by focus group interview
Unit of Measure: Thematic analysis of interview records.
Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention.
Implementation fidelity and adherence to person-centred care principles measured by session recordings and fidelity checklist
Unit of Measure: 1). Number and reasons for missed sessions; 2). Percentage of sessions meeting fidelity criteria.
Time frame: Ongoing monitoring during intervention.
Long-term maintenance and retention of participants measured by cost-effectiveness analysis and retention and dropout records
Unit of Measure: 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained; 2). Number and reasons of dropout.
Time frame: At 6 months post-intervention.
Barriers and Facilitators to the intervention measured by focus group interview
Unit of Measure: Thematic analysis of interview records.
Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.