Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of intrapleural talc pleurodesis versus autologous blood patch therapy(ABPT) in patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax(SSP) complicated by persistent air leak(PAL), and to assess the trial feasibility for a subsequent full-scale, multicentre randomised controlled trial(RCT). Hypothesis: Talc pleurodesis and ABPT demonstrate comparable efficacy in stopping PAL and facilitating chest drain removal within 5 days. Design and subjects: This single-centre, two-arm, open-label pilot RCT will recruit 30 patients with SSP and PAL persisting ≥5 days. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive intrapleural talc pleurodesis or ABPT. Digital chest drain systems will continuously record air leak rates from 24 hours before randomization until 120 hours post-intervention, ensuring objective, real-time data capture. Patients will be followed till 90 days post-discharge. Interventions: Recruited subjects with PAL ≥5 days will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive talc pleurodesis or ABPT. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is complete cessation of air leak and successful chest drain removal within 5 days after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include absolute and percentage changes in digitally measured air leak rates, duration of chest drainage, recurrence of ipsilateral pneumothorax, need for additional pleural interventions, and safety outcomes such as drain blockage and pleural infection. Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis for all randomised subjects with regression models adjusting for confounders. The pilot outcomes will inform sample size calculations and refine design parameters for the proposed full-scale multicentre RCT.
Pneumothorax, defined as the presence of air in the pleural space, is a common respiratory emergency that often necessitates prolonged hospitalisation. In cases where pneumothorax occurs in the setting of underlying chronic lung diseases (secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, SSP), the clinical course is considerably more severe. SSP patients are typically more hypoxic, more likely to develop persistent air leak (PAL) (exceeding 5-7 days), and experience longer hospital stays with higher in-patient mortality compared to those with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). The management of SSP with PAL remains controversial despite its clinical significance. Numerous strategies, including chemical pleurodesis, autologous blood patch therapy (ABPT), implantation of endobronchial valves (EBV), and surgical pleurodesis, are employed in practice. However, many SSP patients are unsuitable for invasive procedures such as EBV placement or surgery, owing to their poor premorbid status. In this context, ABPT and chemical pleurodesis (often using talc) emerge as low-cost, bedside alternatives. Yet, current practices vary widely, and a lack of robust comparative evidence has left clinicians with no definitive guidance regarding the optimal management approach. Talc pleurodesis, involving the intrapleural instillation of sterile talc powder, is a commonly adopted treatment for SSP with PAL. Retrospective studies indicate that 37.2% to 44.5% of SSP patients undergo chemical pleurodesis, with talc being the predominant agent. Reported treatment success is around 70%, with a median drainage duration of 12 days post-procedure. Adverse events, most notably chest pain affecting roughly one-third of patients, are not uncommon, although more serious complications such as respiratory distress occur in only 1.6% of cases. Nonetheless, these findings are derived from studies with retrospective designs and variable methodologies, limiting firm conclusions on efficacy and safety. In contrast, ABPT has been proposed as a promising alternative for managing PAL. This technique involves the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood with the aim of sealing the air leak, initially developed for PAL in post-operative pneumothorax. Several small-scale retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that ABPT can achieve cessation in 26% to 91% of cases, with some reports showing 71.7% to 84.0% of patients experiencing complete resolution within five days. Moreover, ABPT appears safe for repeated administration, with adverse events reported at incidences ranging from 0% to 16%. However, the heterogeneous outcomes likely reflect differences in blood dosage, timing of intervention, number of administrations, and varying definitions of PAL among studies. Given the controversy and the limitations of existing evidence, a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing talc pleurodesis with ABPT is imperative. To achieve this, a pilot study is designed to rigorously address methodological weaknesses by standardising the timing of pleural interventions, employing a digital chest drain system for precise, quantitative measurement of air leak, and adopting unified criteria for treatment success.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
intrapleural instillation of talc slurry
intrapleural instillation of patient's own venous blood
Complete cessation of air leak within 5 days of study intervention
Complete cessation of air leak for more than 24 hours and successful chest drain removal within 5 days after talc pleurodesis or ABPT
Time frame: 5 days
Change in the average rate of air leak
Absolute reduction and percentage change in the average rate of air leak (in mL/min) from randomisation to 5 days after the study interventions
Time frame: 5 days
Time to air leak cessation
Time from study intervention to complete cessation of air leak and successful removal of all chest drain(s) (in hours)
Time frame: 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay after study intervention (in days)
Time frame: 3 months
Recurrence of pneumothorax
Recurrence of ipsilateral pneumothorax after study intervention
Time frame: 3 months
Number of patients requiring additional intervention
The need for additional (unplanned or elective) interventions for persistent air leak, which includes needle aspiration, chest drain insertion, implantation of endobronchial valve, surgery
Time frame: 3 months
Pain score
Pain score in visual analogue scale, score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain ever
Time frame: 5 days
Breathlessness score
Breathlessness by visual analogue scale, score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 means no breathlessness, and 100 means the worst breathlessness ever
Time frame: 5 days
Adverse events
Occurrence of adverse events directly related to study interventions (e.g. drain blockage, pleural infection / empyema, fever, acute respiratory distress syndrome)
Time frame: 3 months
Spirometry parameter
Pre-bronchodilater spirometry parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity, both in liter) at 1 and 3 month follow up
Time frame: 3 months
6-minute walking distance
6-minute walking distance (in meter) at 1 and 3 month follow up
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.