This study is being conducted to assess the effects of a prebiotic product, Arrabina P, on appetite in healthy adults. The goal is to see if this product can help with appetite regulation, support gut health, and support weight management.
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel, 3-arm, placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of Arrabina P Prebiotic on satiety in healthy adults. The primary goal of this study is to assess how two different doses of Arrabina P affect self-reported appetite. Secondary goals include evaluating weight control, eating behaviors, mood, sleep quality, and memory. The product is expected to support beneficial gut bacteria, help maintain lipid levels, and promote digestive comfort and appetite regulation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
135
Active Powder
Active Powder
Placebo Powder
Indago Research Health Center,Inc.
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Vantage Clinical Trials, LLC
Tampa, Florida, United States
Boston Clinical Trials - Alcanza
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Hunger.
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Fullness
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Satiation
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Prospective food consumption
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in iAUC of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm VAS over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Hunger
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in iAUC of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm VAS over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Fullness
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in iAUC of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm VAS over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Satiation
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on appetite control, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in iAUC of the following self-reported appetite sensations, with each sensation measured using a 100 mm VAS over 4 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Prospective food consumption
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on body weight, compared to placebo
Percent change from baseline to Week 12 in body weight
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on eating behaviours, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in eating behaviors as assessed by the following questionnaires 2 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ)
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on eating behaviours, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in eating behaviors' as assessed by the following questionnaires 2 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ)
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on eating behaviours, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in eating behaviors' as assessed by the following questionnaires 2 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait (FCQ-T)
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on eating behaviors, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in eating behaviors' as assessed by the following questionnaires 2 hours after the consumption of a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast - Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait (FCQ-T)
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Triglycerides
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on blood lipid biomarkers, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 in the following blood lipid biomarkers in fasting blood samples with each dose level of TP or placebo: Triglycerides
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bifidobacteriaceae (B.longum) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bifidobacteriaceae (B.longum) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bifidobacteriaceae (B. bifidum) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bifidobacteriaceae (B. bifidum) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Prevotellaceae (P. copri) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Prevotellaceae (P. copri) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (C. cellulosilyticus) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (C. cellulosilyticus) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (B.thetaiotaomicron) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (B.thetaiotaomicron) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (B. intestinalis) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Bacteriodes (B. intestinalis) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Lactobacillaceae (Lactobacillus) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Lactobacillaceae (Lactobacillus) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Ruminococceae (F. prausnitzzi) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Ruminococceae (F. prausnitzzi) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Lachnospiraceae (R. hominis) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Lachnospiraceae (R. hominis) as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 4 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Akkermansia spp as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on microbiota composition, compared to placebo
Change from baseline to Week 12 stool sample in the abundance of the following beneficial microbes: Akkermansia spp as assessed by 16s RNA sequencing
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on gastrointestinal health, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 4 in gastrointestinal symptoms rating scales (GSRS)
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on gastrointestinal health, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 12 in gastrointestinal symptoms rating scales (GSRS)
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on mood, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 4 in mood state as assessed by the Brunel Mood Scale Questionnaire (BRUMS-24) total mood disturbance score and sub-scales
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on mood, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 12 in mood state as assessed by the Brunel Mood Scale Questionnaire (BRUMS-24) total mood disturbance score and sub-scales
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on sleep quality, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 4 in sleep quality as assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on sleep quality, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 12 in sleep quality as assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Week 12
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on memory, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 4 in memory as assessed by Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ)
Time frame: Week 4
To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on memory, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 12 in memory as assessed by Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ)
Time frame: Week 12
Subgroup only: To evaluate the effect of TP at two dose levels on postprandial glucose and insulin response, compared to placebo
Changes from baseline to Week 4 in the postprandial profile of glucose and insulin over 4 hours after a standardized high-carbohydrate breakfast with each dose level of TP or placebo
Time frame: Week 4