Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

Nanchong Central Hospital466 enrolled

Overview

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

466

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia Laparoscopic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * ►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement * Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia. * agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * ►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases. * pregnant or lactating women. * those with surgical contraindications.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time required for patient surgery

Time frame: 20-120minutes

Secondary Outcomes

Inguinal hernia recurrence

the recurrence of inguinal hernia

Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months,1year,2years,3years,6years

Quality of life assessment

Quality of life assessment:The international general quality of life scale (such as SF - 36, etc.) is used to evaluate the quality of life of patients at 3 months , 6months,1year,2years,3years and 6years after surgery.

Time frame: 3 months,6months,1year,2years,3years,6years