Hysteroscopy for Chronic Endometritis: Diagnostic Performance and Observer Variability

Overview

This study investigates the role of hysteroscopy in diagnosing chronic endometritis (CE), a condition linked to female infertility but difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific symptoms. While histological examination with CD138 ( Cluster of Differentiation 138 )immunohistochemistry is the gold standard, hysteroscopy remains widely used. This prospective, multicenter study included infertile women with no uterine abnormalities on ultrasound. Hysteroscopy was performed using standardized criteria, and its diagnostic performance was compared to histopathology. Intra- and inter-observer variability were also assessed through blinded video evaluations by two specialists. The study aimed to determine the reliability of hysteroscopy in diagnosing CE and its agreement among different observers.

This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy in detecting chronic endometritis (CE), a condition associated with female infertility. CE is characterized by persistent endometrial inflammation and is challenging to diagnose due to its nonspecific clinical presentation. Histopathological examination with CD138 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is currently the gold standard for CE diagnosis, yet hysteroscopy remains a commonly used tool in clinical practice. This prospective, multicenter study was conducted between June 6, 2021, and August 8, 2022, and included infertile women aged 18 to 42 years. Participants were selected based on normal pelvic ultrasound findings, while patients with biological inflammatory syndrome, recent acute genital infections, autolysed biopsies, unusable hysteroscopy videos, atypical hyperplasia, or endometrial cancer were excluded. The final cohort comprised 70 patients. Hysteroscopy was performed during the late follicular phase (days 8-12) using a 2.9 mm 30° rigid hysteroscope with saline distension. The procedure was conducted using a "no-touch" technique to minimize endometrial trauma and ensure accurate video interpretation. Endometrial biopsies were obtained using a Novak curette for subsequent CD138 IHC analysis. The hysteroscopic diagnosis of CE was based on standardized criteria proposed by Cicinelli et al., including micro polyps, focal and diffuse hyperaemia, stromal oedema, strawberry aspect, and haemorrhagic spots. Recorded hysteroscopic videos were independently reviewed by two reproductive medicine specialists. To assess intra- and inter-observer variability, a second blinded evaluation was conducted four weeks later by the same observers. The study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of hysteroscopy in diagnosing CE while evaluating the consistency of observer interpretations. By comparing hysteroscopic findings to histopathological results, the study provides insights into the reliability of hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool for CE and highlights its limitations due to observer variability.