ASCEND is a randomized controlled open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation (PFA) with the novel FARAPOINT catheter compared to the standard radiofrequency (RFA) ablation with ThermoCool ST/FlexAbility SE/ThermoCool ST SF/TactiFlex SE of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The study hypothesis is that the PFA ablation is more efficient compared to the RFA technique but retains a comparable safety profile.
The ASCEND trial is a pilot study that will test the hypothesis that the novel FARAPOINT catheter and the FARAPULSE PFA platform can accomplish ischemic substrate VT ablation more efficiently and with a similar safety profile compared to a contemporary, widely adopted RFA technology (ThermoCool ST/FlexAbility SE/ThermoCool ST SF/TactiFlex SE). ASCEND is a single center, controlled (two-arm), 1:1 parallel-randomized, open-label pilot study of 40 consecutively enrolled patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and drug refractory or drug intolerant VT in whom a catheter ablation procedure is indicated. The study intervention consists of the use of a novel FARAPOINT PFA catheter during the entire VT ablation procedure. Patients randomized to the control arm of the study will undergo VT ablation using a contemporary standard-of-care technology (ThermoCool ST/FlexAbility SE/ThermoCool ST SF/TactiFlex SEcatheters). This pilot study is designed to test for superiority with respect to the primary efficacy metric and to ensure comparable safety profiles of both ablation methods.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
RFA ablation of VT substrate using FlexAbility or ThermoCool ST catheter
PFA ablation of VT substrate using FARAPOINT catheter
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGProcedural Efficiency
Total ablation time (in seconds) needed to achieve complete elimination of late abnormal ventricular activities (LAVAs) in myocardial scar.
Time frame: Periprocedural
Procedural Safety
Count of individuals who experience any of the following: * Cardiac perforation * Pericardial effusion with hemodynamic compromise or needing intervention * New complete heart block * Coronary spasm * Acute MI * New acute severe mitral regurgitation or aortic regurgitation * Deep venous thrombosis * Vascular injury requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention * Pulmonary embolism * Stroke * Acute kidney injury * Death
Time frame: Within 7 days post procedure
Secondary Safety
Changes in LVEF and/or new wall motion abnormalities at follow-up TTE
Time frame: 180 days post procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.