Comparison of the Functional Properties of Two Injectable Materials in Posterior Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT06894186

Future University in Egypt52 enrolled

Overview

Using two different injectable materials in class II cavities to compare functional properties

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Class II Dental Caries Dental Caries Injectable Composite

Interventions

Gaenial universal injectableOTHER

GC Gaenial universal injectable advanced injectable composite with nano sized filler that merge the adaptation of flowable composite and mechanical properties of hybird composite

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 21 YearsMax age: 50 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * 1-Adult patients (20-50) 2-Good oral hygiene Good oral hygiene (Plaque index ≤2 (Moderate accumulation with plaque in the sulcus)) 3-Patient approval 4-Absence of parafunctional habits and/or bruxism 5-No endodontic treatment or abscess 6- class II either mesial or distal (no MOD cavities) Exclusion Criteria: * 1\. Systematic disease that may affect participation. 2. Xerostomic patients. 3. Bad oral hygiene (plaque index 2 or 3) 14 4. Heavy smokers 5. Patients undergoing or will start orthodontic treatment 6. Signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Marginal adaptation

Time frame: T1: 1week T2: 6months T3 12 months

1- fracture of restoration and retention 2- proximal contact poiont

Time frame: T(Time) T1:1 week hours beasline T2: 6 months T3:12 months

Central Contacts

Nourhan Elsayed Abdelrhman, BDS

CONTACT

01111001709 Khalilnourhan1@gmail.com

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.