The AMPER (Agent-based Memory Prosthesis to Encourage Reminiscing) system has been built to help people with Alzheimer's disease by improving their memory recall and quality of life. Alzheimer's often leads to the loss of autobiographical memories, which can affect a person's sense of identity. AMPER seeks to address this by creating a digital memory aid that uses an engaging, animated character on a tablet to help individuals with Alzheimer's reminisce about their past. By presenting personally relevant stories, images, audio, and videos, the character helps trigger memories and encourages interaction with caregivers. This is proof of concept study using a randomised controlled trial methodology. Twenty participants will be randomised to the control and 20 randomised to the intervention condition. The intervention group will use a personalised version of the AMPER app with tailored content and the control group will use a non-personalised version without specific adaptations. Over 12 weeks, participants will use the app at home with their caregivers. Researchers will measure changes in their memory and cognitive abilities before and after these 12 weeks. The primary goal is to see if personalised reminiscence improves the perceived quality of the reminiscence experience and autobiographical memory ability compared to the same app with a non-personalised approach. This will be measured using a combination of automatically gathered app use data and weekly caregiver feedback. Secondary goals are to investigate any difference between participants in the intervention and control condition in their technology acceptance, quality of life, self-esteem, everyday functioning and cognitive ability. Feedback from this research will help refine AMPER and inform future studies, with the ultimate goal of creating a widely accessible tool that supports memory and well-being in Alzheimer's patients. Table 1 provides a summary of the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
AMPER has an embodied agent (CGI character) who will ask questions about various memory cues such as pictures, audio files and videos from a BBC reminiscence archive (https://remarc.bbcrewind.co.uk/) to bring to the surface memories residing in the still viable regions of the brain. Personalised AMPER is personalised to preferences and age of the participant.
AMPER has an embodied agent (CGI character) who will ask questions about various memory cues such as pictures, audio files and videos from a BBC reminiscence archive (https://remarc.bbcrewind.co.uk/) to bring to the surface memories residing in the still viable regions of the brain. Non-personliased AMPER is not personalised to preferences or age of the participant.
University of Strathclyde
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Quality of autobiographical memory during AMPER use
We will analyse the richness of episodic and semantic details in the participant's recollections (which are audio recorded during the trial). This method will ensure a systematic evaluation of memory quality during interactions facilitated by the AMPER app. This rating procedure will use the methodology outlined by Levine and colleagues (2002) and will be scored using the semi-automated methodology outlined by Wardell and colleagues (2021).
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of AMPER use at 12 weeks
Autobiographical Memory ability (objectively rated)
Objective rating of Autobiographical Memory ability using the Autobiographical Memory Interview (Kopelman et al., 1989)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Autobiographical Memory ability (subjectively rated)
Autobiographical memory ability will be subjectively rated using the Autobiographical Recollection Test (ART), (Berntsen et al., 2019).
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Autobiographical Memory ability (subjectively rated on SAM)
Autobiographical memory ability will also be subjectively rated using the survey of Autobiographical memory (SAM), (Palombo et al., 2012)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Functional ability in tasks of everyday living
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), (Lawton \& Brody, 1969)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Quality of life for the individual with Alzheimer's disease (subjective)
Quality of life Alzheimer's Disease (Logsdon et al., 1999)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Level of Depression experienced by the person with AD (subjective)
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), (Yesavage et al., 1982),
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Cognitive ability of the person with AD
Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination ACE-III (Mioshi et al., 2006)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Verbal learning ability for the person with AD
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) (Benedict et al., 1998)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Short term verbal memory for person with AD
Digit Span forwards and backwards from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th edition), (Wechsler, 2008)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Executive functioning for person with AD
Trail Making Test (Reitan, \& Wolfson, 1985)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Modified Hachinski Ischemia Scale score for person with AD
Modified Hachinski Ischemia Scale (mHIS) (Hachinski et al., 2012)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Self-esteem for the person with AD
The Rosenberg Self Esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965)
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
Technology acceptance for person with AD
The ALMERE questionnaire (Heerink et al., 2010).
Time frame: Baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 14)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.