TAVR: The Impact of Prothesis Positioning on Valvular and Coronary Hemodynamics

Overview

The aim of this clinical study is to learn more about the effects of TAVR-prosthesis positioning on hemodynamics and the coronary arteries. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and the echocardiography imaging provide an equivalent alternative to the computer tomography which is the state of the art in evaluating commissural alignment? 2. What effect does the position of the valve on the annular level have, especially its symmetrical and commissural position, on valvular and aortic blood flow characteristics? 3. What is the influence of symmetrical position and the presence of a commissural alignment on the coronary flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Coming from a treatment option only for a high-risk cohort of elderly patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a safe and effective therapeutic approach for most patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Therefore, current guidelines recommend TAVR in patients from the age of 75 and even low surgical risk. Especially with the increasingly younger patient clientele, lifetime management is of utmost importance. Lifetime management includes, for example: * Preserving coronary access after TAVR * "Durability" of the new valve. * Prevention of paravalvular leakage * Prevention of atrioventricular blocks, which may necessitate a pacemaker. The first two factors are particularly important and have therefore become the focus of the work. Relating to this, the investigators would like to investigate three points: 1. Coronary access after TAVR is an important aspect for especially younger patients with longer life expectancy. The manufacturers try to address this task by offering techniques, which should help to orientate the novel commissures of the TAVR-valve within the native commissures of the diseased valve. Until now, the commissural alignment (CA) or misalignment (misCA) can only be depicted by post-TAVR cardiac computer tomography (CT) or selective coronary angiography, coming along with additional radiation and contrast medium exposure. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) as well as transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be alternative diagnostic options but have not been tested so far. 2. Transvalvular blood flow characteristics depending on the position of TAVR-prosthesis at the annular level may play a significant role concerning prothesis durability. However, it is unknown whether an asymmetric position or the presence of a CA may alter flow profile and therefore cause secondary endothelial stress leading to long term damage. With transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), TEE and CMRI the investigators would like to characterize flow patterns depending on symmetric vs. asymmetric valve position and CA vs. misCA. 3. It is not known what influence the TAVR position, more precisely a symmetric implantation and the presence of a CA, has on coronary flow and clinical outcomes. To investigate this, the investigators will record coronary flow in TEE and CMR after the implantation. The results could be used in the future to detect CA or misCA and thereby evaluate and improve implantation techniques without harming the patient. Furthermore, if the investigators can identify advantages in symmetrically implanted TAVR with CA in terms of valve and coronary flow, techniques can be developed that target both symmetric and CA.