This clinical trial evaluates whether a mentorship and education intervention called COACH-APP works to improve advanced practice providers' (APPs) confidence in their ability to participate in clinical research (research self-efficacy). APPs are skilled clinicians who are routinely part of cancer care teams, but who may not routinely be part of the research care team at community oncology sites. The COACH-APP program provides focused education and structured mentorship to assist in meaningful integration to the research care team, which may increase research self-efficacy among APPs and ultimately improve patient care and access to clinical trials.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare change in research self-efficacy (RSE) scores from baseline to end of study (12 months post-randomization) between APPs in the COACH-APP intervention compared to the education control. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) engagement post-study (12-months) for APPs in the COACH-APP intervention compared to the education control. II. To compare changes from baseline to post-study in APP ratings of research care team integration (Assessment for Collaborative Environments \[ACE\]-15) between the COACH-APP intervention and education control. III. To compare practice-level NCORP and National Clinical Trial Network (NCTN) study activity as measured by total number of accruals (patient, non-patient, and organizational) and number of actively recruiting NCORP and NCTN studies over 24 months between practices with APPs receiving the COACH-APP intervention versus those in education control. IV. Within the COACH-APP intervention group, to measure acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of the COACH-APP intervention for APPs and COACH-APP mentors to guide future implementation. V. Within the COACH-APP intervention group, conduct semi-structured interviews with a sub-set of mentors, APPs, and other key research team members (collaborating oncologists and clinical research professionals) to assess: * Va. Perceptions of feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the COACH-APP intervention; * Vb. Potential effects of the COACH-APP intervention on the research care team functioning and environment; * Vc. Potential effects of the COACH-APP intervention on patient care quality and access to clinical trials; * Vd. Practice-level barriers and facilitators of APP engagement in research activities.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
97
Receive access to SWOG APP Clinical Research workshop. Receive The Advanced Practice Provider Clinical Trials Research Manual
Complete mentorship intervention
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Helen F Graham Cancer Center
Newark, Delaware, United States
RECRUITINGQueen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
RECRUITINGThe Queen's Medical Center - West Oahu
‘Ewa Beach, Hawaii, United States
Research self-efficacy (RSE)
RSE score is calculated as sum of the 22-items measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Will be compared between the COACH-APP intervention and education control arms using a two-sample t-test.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months post-randomization
National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) engagement
Measured by the sum of 8-items measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Will be compared between the COACH-APP intervention and education control arms using linear regression.
Time frame: At 12 months post randomization
Change in research care team integration
Measured by the Assessment for Collaborative Environments (ACE)-15. Will follow the same analysis plan as for the primary outcome.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months post randomization
Practice-level NCORP and National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) study activity
Measured by total number of accruals (patient, non-patient, and organizational) and number of actively recruiting NCORP and NCTN studies. Will be compared between the COACH-APP intervention and education control arms using linear regression.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Acceptability of COACH-APP intervention (COACH-APP arm only)
As measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Will be summarized for the APPs in the COACH-APP intervention arm using mean and standard deviation and by capturing the percent who agree or strongly agree with the items.
Time frame: At 12 months
Feasibility of COACH-APP intervention (COACH-APP arm only)
As measured by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Will be summarized for the APPs in the COACH-APP intervention arm using mean and standard deviation and by capturing the percent who agree or strongly agree with the items.
Time frame: At 12 months
Appropriateness of COACH-APP intervention (COACH-APP arm only)
As measured by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Will be summarized for the APPs in the COACH-APP intervention arm using mean and standard deviation and by capturing the percent who agree or strongly agree with the items.
Time frame: At 12 months
Perceptions of feasibility of the COACH-APP intervention
Measured via qualitative interview. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
Perceptions of acceptability of the COACH-APP intervention
Measured via qualitative interview. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
Perceptions of appropriateness of the COACH-APP intervention
Measured via qualitative interview. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
Potential effects of the COACH-APP intervention on the research care team functioning and environment
Measured via qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
Potential effects of the COACH-APP intervention on patient care quality and access to clinical trials
Measured via qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
Practice-level barriers and facilitators of APP engagement in research activities
Measured via qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data will be used to summarize key themes from the APP, Mentor and RC Team semi-structured interview recordings and transcripts.
Time frame: Day 1 (At time of interview)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Illinois Cancer Care-Bloomington
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGIllinois Cancer Care - Eureka
Eureka, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGIllinois CancerCare-Galesburg
Galesburg, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGIllinois CancerCare-Macomb
Macomb, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGSSM Health Good Samaritan
Mount Vernon, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGIllinois Cancer Care-Pekin
Pekin, Illinois, United States
RECRUITING...and 21 more locations