This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an internet-based guided self-help intervention developed based on Problem Solving Therapy, a transdiagnostic low-intensity intervention recommended by the World Health Organization, in improving medical professionals' mental health.
Despite the high prevalence of common mental health problems among medical professionals (MPs), their help-seeking for mental health support is low due to barriers such as lack of time, shortage of mental health professionals, and the belief that mental health is not the priority. Existing interventions are empirically effective but practically challenging to be applied in Hong Kong given the long intervention hours and fixed schedule. New interventions are needed to cater for the unique needs of local MPs. Objectives: An internet-based guided self-help intervention for MPs, E-training for Medical Professionals On Wellbeing and Effective Resolutions (the EMPOWER program), will be developed based on Problem Solving Therapy (PST), a transdiagnostic low-intensity intervention recommended by the World Health Organization. Targeted at local MPs aged 18-60 with depression and/or anxiety symptoms, the intervention aims to reduce their symptoms through strengthening coping skills for work-related problems. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate (1) the intervention's efficacy in reducing depression/anxiety compared with wait-list control (WLC); (2) its efficacy in improving the levels of PTSD, well-being, burnout, and work performance versus WLC; (3) the potential mediators/mechanisms explaining any between-group differences. Method: 120 participants will be recruited online. The EMPOWER group will receive four 30-min self-paced weekly intervention sessions. The WLC will receive the intervention after the study period. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 1-month follow-up. The group effect will be examined by comparing the mean improvement scores and remission rates on the outcome variables among the two groups. The potential mediation effects of adaptive problem solving strategies between the two groups and the outcomes will also be tested. Expected outcomes: The investigators expect (1) greater reductions in depression and/or anxiety as well as levels of PTSD, well-being, burnout, and work performance for the EMPOWER group at post-treatment and 1-month follow-up than WLC, and that (2) the EMPOWER program will reduce depression and/or anxiety through enhancement in adaptive problem-solving strategies. Implications: Findings can help to identify a cost-effective, flexible, and readily accessible mental health intervention for local MPs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
120
The EMPOWER programme aims to help participants acquire problem-solving skills adapted into the context of MPs' workplace and daily life to address their work-related, personal, and interpersonal problems, including self-neglect, work-life imbalance, patient communication problems, as well as stress during emerging public health crises. The session elements include video introduction, metaphors, daily examples, and narrative stories with prototype MP characters depicting the targeted problems to demonstrate how the taught problem-solving skills could be applied in a variety of situations. Brief exercise and homework will be assigned after each session and personalized written feedback will be provided.
The waitlist control receive education materials covering (1) introduction of mental health problems; (2) signs, symptoms, causes, and consequences of anxiety and depression, and (3) treatment approaches and available community resources.
JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, CUHK
Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGChange from baseline depression immediately after the interventions
The outcome will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) consisting of 9 questions designed to correspond to the 9 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Items are rated from 0 to 3 according to increased frequency of experiencing difficulties in each area covered. Scores are summed and can range from 0 to 27. Score 10 is often recommended as the cut-off score to detect major depressive disorder. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. The Chinese version has been validated.
Time frame: immediately after the interventions
Change from baseline depression 1 month after the interventions
The outcome will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) consisting of 9 questions designed to correspond to the 9 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Items are rated from 0 to 3 according to increased frequency of experiencing difficulties in each area covered. Scores are summed and can range from 0 to 27. Score 10 is often recommended as the cut-off score to detect major depressive disorder. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. The Chinese version has been validated.
Time frame: 1 month after the interventions
Change from baseline anxiety immediately after the interventions
The outcome will be measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD), which is a 7-item instrument developed to identify likely cases of generalized anxiety disorder in primary care patients. Items are rated for the last two weeks, using a four-point rating scale for duration from 1 ("not at all") to 5 ("nearly every day"). A score of 10 or greater represents a cut point for identifying cases of generalized anxiety disorder, while cut points of 5, 10, 15, and 20 are interpreted as representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe levels of anxiety. The Chinese version has been validated.
Time frame: Immediately after the interventions
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change from baseline anxiety 1 month after the interventions
The outcome will be measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD), which is a 7-item instrument developed to identify likely cases of generalized anxiety disorder in primary care patients. Items are rated for the last two weeks, using a four-point rating scale for duration from 1 ("not at all") to 5 ("nearly every day"). A score of 10 or greater represents a cut point for identifying cases of generalized anxiety disorder, while cut points of 5, 10, 15, and 20 are interpreted as representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe levels of anxiety. The Chinese version has been validated.
Time frame: 1 month after the interventions