This study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel groups, open-label, phase 3 study in subjects with untreated newly diagnoses Multiple Myeloma eligible for ASCT. 824 patients will be enrolled in this study from approximately 70 study sites. The 2 parts in the Treatment Phase are described below. Part 1: Induction/ASCT/Consolidation Phase (1:1 Randomization) After the screening period, patients will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either: * Arm A (standard of care arm): standard induction therapy with 4 cycles of D-VRd, followed by HDCT (Melphalan) + ASCT, D-VRd consolidation therapy * Arm B (experimental arm): standard induction therapy with 4 cycles of D-VRd, followed by elranatamab and lenalidomide consolidation therapy. Part 2: Maintenance Phase (1:1 Re-randomization) Patients will be re-randomized (1:1) and will enter the Maintenance Phase upon completion of consolidation therapy. * Arm C (standard of care arm): lenalidomide * Arm D (experimental arm): elranatamab
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
824
Elranatamab is given to arm B patients in association with lenalidomide (for consolidation) and arm D patients in monotherapy (for maintenance) as experimental arms
In association with daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (Arm A), in association with elranatamab (Arm B), in monotherapy (Arm C)
Daratumumab is given in association with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in induction therapy (all patients) and consolidation arm A
ASCT is performed in consolidation for Arm A patients after induction therapy with D-VRD
Bortezomib is given in associtaion with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in induction (all patients) and consolidation Arm A
Dexamethasone is given in association with daratumumab, bortezomib and lenalidomide in induction (all patients) and consolidation Arm A
Amiens
Amiens, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCHU Angers
Angers, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCh Annecy Genevois
Annecy, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCentre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPart 1 (induction/consolidation) from Randomization 1 (R1): to assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior to standard of care, in terms of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity rate
To assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior to standard of care, in terms of MRD negativity rate.
Time frame: at end of consolidation, up to 36 months
Part 2 (maintenance) from Randomization 2 (R2): to assess whether maintenance therapy with elranatamab is superior to standard of care, in terms of Progression Free Survival (PFS).
To assess whether maintenance therapy with elranatamab is superior to standard of care, in terms of PFS.
Time frame: from the date of second randomization to the date of confirmed PD (IMWG criteria,) or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 93 monts
Key secondary objectives: Part 1 (induction/consolidation) from R1: to assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior, in terms of PFS
To assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior, in terms of PFS
Time frame: PFS defined as the time interval from the date of first randomization to the date of confirmed Progression Disease (IMWG criteria) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first., assessed up to 128 months
Key secondary objectives: Part I (induction/consolidation) from R1: to assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior to standard of care, in terms of Overal Survival (OS)
To assess whether consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide is superior to standard of care, in terms of OS
Time frame: up to 128 months
Part 1 (induction/consolidation) from R1: to assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide compared to standard of care
To assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with elranatamab and lenalidomide compared to standard of care: Overall response rate (ORR), Very good partial response (VGPR) rate, Complete response (CR) rate
Time frame: End of consolidation phase, up to 36 months
Part 2 (maintenance) from R2: to assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab
To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab: * Overall response rate (ORR) in maintenance * Very good partial response (VGPR) rate in maintenance * Complete response (CR) rate in maintenance
Time frame: end of maintenance, up to 58 months
assess safety & Tolerability during induction, and during consolidation and maintenance therapy: Adverse events (AE), serious Adrverse events (SAE) and And adverse events of special interest (AESI) rates - Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
To assess safety during induction, and during consolidation and maintenance therapy: AEs, SAE and AESI rates , Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events \[Safety and Tolerability\]
Time frame: through study completion, up to 128 months
Throughout the study to evaluate the impact of treatment on health-related Quality of Life (QoL) using Rework questionnaire
To evaluate the impact of treatment on health-related QoL: Rework questionnaire
Time frame: through study completion, up to 128 months
Part 2 (maintenance) from Randomization 2 (R2): to assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab, Progression Free Survival 2 form Randomization 2
To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab: \- PFS of subsequent/next treatment line (PFS2 from R2)
Time frame: up to 128 months
Part 2 (maintenance) from R2: to assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab, in term of Minimal Residual Disease negativity
To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab: \- MRD negativity at 12 months post R2
Time frame: 12 months post R2, up to 71 months
Throughout the study: to evaluate the impact of treatment on health-related Quality of Life (QoL) using EQ-5D-5L
To evaluate the impact of treatment on health-related QoL: scale title :EQ-5D-5L , the minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 100 (100 corresponds to the best health that patient can imagine, 0 corresponds to the worst health that patient can imagine
Time frame: Though study completion, an average of 11 years
Part 2 (maintenance) from R2: To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab (OS R2)
To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with elranatamab: \- Overall survival from second randomization (OS R2)
Time frame: up to 128 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre Hospitalier H. Duffaut
Avignon, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCentre hospitalier de la Côte Basque
Bayonne, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCHU Besançon
Besançon, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCentre Hospitalier Simone Veil
Blois, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCHU Bordeaux - Hopital Haut Lévêque - Centre F. Magendi
Bordeaux, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 54 more locations