The primary purpose of this interventional study is to examine the overall motor learning capacity from exposure to repeated perturbations among ambulatory people with multiple sclerosis (MS). This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.
Falls present a significant health risk for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Perturbation training has emerged as a promising strategy to prevent falls. This type of training, which is based on sensorimotor adaptation and motor learning, capitalizes on the central nervous system's (CNS) ability to develop new motor skills. With repeated exposure to large-scale slip or trip perturbations, participants can quickly learn how to better respond to falls. The primary benefits of this training include improved dynamic stability control, both proactively and reactively, by adjusting the body's center of mass (COM) relative to its base of support (BOS). Sixty-four individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A (training) and Group B (control). Both groups will first participate in an acquisition session. Group A will undergo a training procedure blending slips, trips, and unperturbed walking on a treadmill. In contrast, Group B will walk on the treadmill for the same duration without any perturbations. Immediately following the acquisition session, both groups will experience an unexpected slip and trip while walking over ground (with the order of the slip and trip randomized). Three and six months later, both groups will complete two retention sessions. Each retention session will involve experiencing a treadmill slip and trip (treadmill reslip and retrip) and an overground slip and trip (overground reslip and retrip), with the order randomized. Responses to these perturbations will be measured using the outcomes of fall or non-fall, dynamic stability, leg muscle reaction times, and recovery step length. Additionally, real-life prospective falls and near falls will be monitored for both groups over the six months following the acquisition session. This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
64
Unexpected slips blended with trips and unperturbed walking trials on a treadmill. A safety harness will be worn at all times.
Treadmill walking for the same amount of time as the training group without perturbation. A safety harness will be worn at all times.
Georgia State University Biomechanics Lab
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
RECRUITINGPerturbation Outcome (Fall or Non-Fall) on the Treadmill or Overground
A loadcell will be connected to the safety harness (above the participant's head) and will measure the force exerted on the safety harness during each perturbation trial. Perturbation outcomes will be classified as falls if the peak loadcell force exceeds 30% of the body weight. Otherwise, perturbation outcomes will be classified as non-falls.
Time frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Dynamic Gait Stability as defined by the Feasible Stability Region (FSR) Theory
FSR-based dynamic gait stability considers both the center of mass position and velocity during the slip or trip recovery process. Dynamic stability will be calculated at the foot touchdown before and after the perturbation onset. For slip-falls (or trip-falls), the larger (or smaller) the stability value, the more stable one is in resisting slip-related backward (or trip-induced forward) falling.
Time frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Leg Muscle Reaction Time
The reaction times will be determined as the duration from the perturbation onset to the instant when the respective muscle is activated.
Time frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Recovery Step Length
Recovery step length will be calculated as the distance between the heels at recovery foot touchdown and normalized to body height.
Time frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Prospective Real-Life Falls and Near Falls
Both groups will report their fall or near-fall incidents through an online survey weekly.
Time frame: 6 month period after the acquisition session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.