The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device works to correctly classify colon polyps and adenomas during colonoscopy to guide the selection of proper treatment procedures. It will also learn about the safety of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device improve the correct classification as well as size and depth evaluation of polyps and adenomas during colonoscopy using pathology as gold standard? What adverse events do participants experience during colonoscopy and polypectomy? Researchers will compare 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device to traditional 2-dimensional (2D) imaging device to see if 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device works to improve classification and evaluation accuracy. Participants will: Undertake colonoscopy examination and polypectomy using 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device or 2-dimensional (2D) imaging device. Be followed-up to 30 days to record potential colonoscopy-relevant adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
460
endoscopic diagnostic evaluation of colorectal polyps and adenomas before polypectomy using 2D imaging colonoscope
endoscopic diagnostic evaluation of colorectal polyps and adenomas before polypectomy using 3D imaging colonoscope
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Disease
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Overall diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic polyp classification
The overall proportion of correct classifications by endoscopy (JNET vs. JNET+3D) compared to the gold standard (pathology) at the lesion level, across all polyp types
Time frame: 1-7 days after polypectomy
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic classification for advanced polyps
The overall proportion of correct classifications by endoscopy compared to the gold standard (pathology) in lesion level about advanced polyps Advanced polyp was defined as having a conventional adenoma with size ≥10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia, or a sessile serrated lesion with size ≥10 mm or with dysplasia.
Time frame: 1-7 days after polypectomy
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic classification for serrated lesions
The overall proportion of correct classifications by endoscopy (JNET vs. JNET+3D) compared to the gold standard (pathology) at the lesion level for serrated lesions
Time frame: 1-7 days after polypectomy
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic classification for identifying patients requiring surveillance
patients with complete removal of at least 1 adenoma ≥ 10 mm or with high grade dysplasia, or ≥ 5 adenomas, or any serrated polyp ≥ 10 mm or with dysplasia
Time frame: 1-7 days after polypectomy
Diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR-) for advanced polyps
The following diagnostic accuracy measures will be calculated for endoscopic classification (JNET vs. JNET+3D) in detecting adenomas at the lesion level, using final pathology as the gold standard: Sensitivity Specificity Positive predictive value (PPV) Negative predictive value (NPV) Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) Negative likelihood ratio (LR-)
Time frame: 1-7 days after polypectomy
The colonoscopy-relevant adverse events
aspiration pneumonia, perforation, bleeding, splenic injury/rupture, death, or others requiring hospitalization within 30 days after the colonoscopy
Time frame: 1-30 days after polypectomy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.