This observational, multicenter, case-control study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar (levodopa/benserazide) in the treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) among Chinese patients. The study will enroll patients diagnosed with PD according to the MDS criteria, aged 18-80, with modified Hoehn-Yahr stages 1-2.5, and who have not previously used Entacapone. Participants will be assigned to two groups based on their prior treatment history: the LBE group (levodopa/benserazide/entacapone) or the LB group (levodopa/benserazide only), according to their actual clinical treatment plan. The study will observe patients over a 24-week period, evaluating changes in motor symptoms using the MDS-UPDRS Part III score as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include assessments of daily living abilities, motor complications, quality of life (PDQ-39), cognitive function (MMSE), global impression (CGI), and safety profiles, including adverse event reporting. This study does not involve any interventional treatment changes; all therapeutic decisions remain at the discretion of the treating physicians. The findings are expected to provide real-world evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of adding Entacapone to Madopar in the management of early PD.
This is an observational, multicenter, case-control study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar (Levodopa/Benserazide, LB) in the treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) in Chinese patients. The study is conducted across multiple centers in China and includes patients diagnosed with PD according to the MDS criteria, aged 18-80 years, with a modified Hoehn-Yahr stage of 1-2.5. Participants will be divided into two groups based on their actual clinical treatment: (1) the LBE group (Levodopa/Benserazide/Entacapone) and (2) the LB group (Levodopa/Benserazide only). The study does not involve any randomization, blinding, or intervention allocation; instead, it reflects real-world clinical practice, where all treatment decisions are made solely by the attending physician. The study will observe patients over a 24-week period to compare the effectiveness of the two treatment strategies in improving motor symptoms, daily living activities, and quality of life, as well as the incidence of adverse events. The primary outcome measure is the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III (motor examination) score from baseline to Week 24. Secondary outcomes include changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II (activities of daily living), Part IV (motor complications), total MDS-UPDRS II+III scores, PDQ-39 quality of life scores, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, MMSE cognitive scores, and modified Hoehn-Yahr staging. Safety assessments include adverse events, serious adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, and ECG findings. All treatments, including medication selection, dosage, and adjustment, will follow the treating physician's routine clinical judgment, and no intervention or modification by the study team will occur. Concomitant medications such as amantadine, anticholinergics, dopamine agonists, and MAO-B inhibitors (e.g., selegiline, rasagiline) are allowed if their doses are stable for at least 30 days before enrollment and remain unchanged throughout the study period. The estimated sample size is 216 participants, with approximately 108 in each group, allowing for a 10% dropout rate. The study is expected to start in June 2025 and complete by April 2027, with final data analysis by June 2027. The results of this study aim to provide real-world evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar in the early-stage PD population in China.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
216
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, Guanxi, China
RECRUITINGChange from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) score
The MDS-UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) assesses the motor function of patients with Parkinson's disease. The total score ranges from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor impairment. The change from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to evaluate treatment efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III total score
he MDS-UPDRS Part II assesses activities of daily living (maximum score: 52) and Part III assesses motor function (maximum score: 132). The combined total score (range: 0-184) reflects overall functional impairment, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) score
The MDS-UPDRS Part II evaluates the impact of Parkinson's disease on activities of daily living (ADL), such as speech, handwriting, dressing, and walking. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The score change from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to assess treatment effectiveness on daily functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part IV score
The MDS-UPDRS Part IV evaluates motor complications including dyskinesia and wearing-off phenomena. Changes in the score from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to assess treatment-related motor complications.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the PDQ-39 summary index score
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains. The summary index score reflects the overall impact of Parkinson's disease on quality of life, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale is used by both investigators and participants to rate overall disease severity and clinical improvement. The score change from baseline to Week 24 will be used to assess perceived treatment effectiveness.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in modified Hoehn-Yahr stage from baseline to Week 24
The modified Hoehn-Yahr staging scale evaluates the severity and progression of Parkinson's disease, with higher stages indicating more advanced disease. Stage change from baseline to Week 24 will be used to assess disease progression or stability.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.