The purpose of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epcoritamab in subjects with relapsed or refractory primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the Central Nervous System treated with rituximab and lenalidomide.
Primary CNS DLBCL has an altered prognostic compared to systemic DLBCL mostly due to an increased relapse rate. PCNSL patients for whom the global prognostic remains poor, calling for improved treatment at relapse. Considering the good results of R2 regimen in R/R PCNSL and the efficacy and favorable safety profile of epcoritamab in R/R systemic DLBCL, the addition of Epcoritamab to the combination of R2 might significantly improve the prognosis of PCNSL patients at relapse. In addition, it is expected that IMiDs could potentially increase the efficiency of epcoritamab by stimulating the immune system.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Epcoritamab Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP): Epcoritamab will be used during induction phase and Maintenance phase.
INSTITUT BERGONIE - Service d'Oncologie Médicale
Bordeaux, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGINSTITUT D'HEMATOLOGIE DE BASSE NORMANDIE - Service Hématologie
Caen, France
The best Objective Response rate (ORR) in the R/R PCNSL cohort
Objective Response rate
Time frame: after 8 months or before in case of permanent treatment discontinuation
Objective response rate (CR + CRu + PR)
Objective response rate
Time frame: after 8 months or before in case of permanent treatment discontinuation
Best objective response rate (CR + CRu + PR) in the PVRL cohort
Objective response rate
Time frame: after 8 months or before in case of permanent treatment discontinuation
Objective response rate (CR + CRu + PR) in the PVRL cohort
Objective response rate
Time frame: after 8 months or before in case of permanent treatment discontinuation
Best complete response rate (CR+CRu)
Best complete response rate
Time frame: after 8 months or before in case of permanent treatment discontinuation
Time to objective response (TTR) according to IPCG recommendations
Time to objective response
Time frame: 44 months after first patient in
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to IPCG recommendations
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Duration of response (DOR) according to IPCG recommendations
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU ESTAING - Service Thérapie Cellulaire et Hématologie Clinique
Clermont-Ferrand, France
RECRUITINGCHU DE LILLE - HOPITAL CLAUDE HURIEZ - Service des Maladies du Sang
Lille, France
RECRUITINGCHR DE MARSEILLE - CHU TIMONE - Service de Neuro-Oncologie
Marseille, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCHRU DE NANCY - HOPITAL CENTRAL - Service de Neurologie
Nancy, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGGHU PITIE-SALPETRIERE - CHARLES FOIX - Service Neurologie
Paris, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGHOPITAL DE LA PITIE SALPETRIERE - Service Hématologie Clinique
Paris, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCHU LYON-SUD - Hématologie Clinique
Pierre-Bénite, France
RECRUITINGCHU PONTCHAILLOU - Hématologie Clinique
Rennes, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 3 more locations
Duration of response
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time to next treatment
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Incidence and severity of AEs, special focus on ICANS, CRS and TLS
Incidence and severity
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Incidence and severity of changes in laboratory values
Incidence and severity
Time frame: 44 months after first patient in
Incidence of dose delay and treatment discontinuation
Incidence of dose delay
Time frame: 44 months after first patient in
Time to deterioration in physical functioning - EORTC QLQ-C30
EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire. 30 questions using a scale of 4: from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (lower score (worse): 120 and higher score (better): 30)
Time frame: 44 months after First Patient In
Cognitive evaluation with MoCA test
10 questions / topics with different scores (between 1 and 6) and with a total score /30" (lower score (worse): 0 and higher score (better)
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in
Time to deterioration in physical functioning - QLQ-HG29
QLQ-HG29 Questionnary of Life: 29 additional questions using a scale of 4: from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (lower score (worse): 116 and higher score (better): 29)
Time frame: 44 months after First Patient In
Cognitive evaluation with with BEARNI test
5 questions / topics with different scores (between 5 and 8) and with a total score /30" (lower score (worse): 0 and higher score (better): 30)
Time frame: 56 months after first patient in