Lenalidomide is a standard of care for maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Recently, two large phase 3 randomized trials demonstrated a progression free survival benefit with daratumumab maintenance post autologous stem cell transplantation. Bispecific antibodies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen are approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory myeloma patients after 3 prior lines of therapy including proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulator IMiD and anti CD38 monoclonal antibody. In the cohort A of the MAGNETISMM-3 phase 2 study (n=123), elranatamab single-agent demonstrated strong efficacy with favorable safety profile in patients with advanced multiple myeloma (median of 5 prior lines, 96% of patients with triple class refractory disease). Lenalidomide has been shown to promote cytotoxic activity of CD3 bispecific antibodies. 7We propose a phase 2 randomized study comparing elranatamab plus lenalidomide versus daratumumab plus lenalidomide for 2 years as post-transplant maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The primary objective is minimal residual disease rate after one year of maintenance. Secondary objectives include Progression-Free Survival, safety, quality of life, return to work and overall survival.
Post transplant maintenance with daratumumab and lenalidomide is now considered a standard of care in transplant eligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients. The T-cell engager elranatamab is approved for relapsed myeloma patients, and is currently evaluated in frontline therapy. The combination of bispecific antibody with lenalidomide demosntrated promising response rates with favorable safety profile. The phase 2 randomized study ELMMA aims to compare the efficacy and safety of elranatamab plus lenalidomide verus daratumumab plus lenalidomide for 2 years as post-transplant maintenance in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Target population: n=176, newly diagnosed myeloma transplant eligible following 4-6 cycles of quadruplet induction and autologous stem cell transplantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
176
Each injection may be up to 2 mL in volume; however, if the maximum volume allowed per institution's policy is lower than 2 mL, the number of injections may be increased to accommodate this difference in volume and ensure the correct dose is delivered. Elranatamab should be administered to the abdomen, with preference given to the lower quadrants when possible. Each participant may receive study intervention for a maximum of 24 cycles.
1800 mg will be administrated every cycles
Daily administarted during 21 days, at each cycle
CHU Angers
Angers, France
CH Côte Basque
Bayonne, France
CHU Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU Caen
Caen, France
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy
Clamart, France
CHU Clermont- Ferrand - Hôpital ESTAING
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
CHRU Dijon
Dijon, France
Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne
Dijon, France
Hôpital Annecy Genevois
Épagny, France
...and 26 more locations
Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate
Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate (10-6, NGS) status after 12 cycles of maintenance
Time frame: At the beginning of cycle 13 (each cycle is 28 days)
Safety and tolerability of Dara-Len and Elra-Len
Presence and severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events), except for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity syndrome, which will be assessed based on American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy guidelines.
Time frame: 4 years
Progression-free survival
Progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of Progressive Disease, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Subjects alive and for whom disease progression has not been observed will be censored at the last date of follow-up.
Time frame: 4 years
Minimal Residual Disease negativity with the threshold evaluated at one year after randomisation
Rate of Minimal Residual Disease status at one year after randomisation
Time frame: At the beginning of cycle 13 (each cycle is 28 days)
Minimal Residual Disease negativity with the threshold evaluated at one two years
Rate of Minimal Residual Disease status at two years after randomization
Time frame: At the beginning of cycle 25 (each cycle is 28 days)
Sustained Minimal Residual Disease negativity
Rate of patients with Minimal Residual Disease negative status during at least 12 months (at least two consecutive times)
Time frame: At the beginning of cycle 13 and 25 (each cycle is 28 days)
Complete Response or better
The rate of complete response or better as defined by International Myeloma Working Group 2016
Time frame: 4 years
Overall survival
Time from randomisation to the date of death due to any cause. Subjects alive will be censored at the last date of follow-up.
Time frame: 4 years
Progression-free survival 2
Time from randomization to either second line Progressive Disease (assessed by investigator on the first subsequent line of antimyeloma therapy) or death, whichever occurs first. Subjects alive and for whom a second disease progression has not been observed will be censored at the last date of follow-up.
Time frame: 4 years
Ability of return to work
Ability of return to work assessed by a specific questionnaire
Time frame: At the beginning of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days), at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months and 48 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.