Based on the difficulties in blood glucose control among the Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) population and the deficiencies of previous studies, this research aims to conduct a clinical comparative study. The short-term blood glucose control effects of the closed-loop system and the combination of a conventional insulin pump and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized LADA patients will be evaluated to explore the clinical application value of these methods in LADA patients. Moreover, this study aims to provide a more precise and personalized blood glucose management plan for LADA patients. As a slowly progressive subtype of autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), LADA patients have significant differences in pathological characteristics, clinical needs, and treatment effects compared with classical T1DM patients. However, they also face huge challenges in blood glucose management. This study will focus on LADA patients for the first time, especially the group of hospitalized patients, to fill the gap in this field. Meanwhile, by introducing the cutting-edge closed-loop system technology, it will provide new ideas and solutions for the clinical blood glucose management of LADA patients. Through a comparative analysis of the short-term blood glucose control effects of the closed-loop system and the combination of a conventional insulin pump and CGM, this study aims to provide more precise and personalized treatment strategies for LADA patients and promote the further development of diabetes treatment technologies.
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of a hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system and a traditional insulin pump in hospitalized patients with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) through a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Referring to the designs of similar clinical trials, the number of cases in each group of this study is determined to be 25, with a total of 50 cases. The study subjects are LADA patients hospitalized in the Department of Endocrinology of Shanxi Bethune Hospital from April 2025 to April 2027. The study design is as follows: Starting from the second 24-hour period after the patient's admission, with each subsequent 24-hour period as a monitoring unit, after collecting baseline data, the patients are randomly divided into two groups: the closed-loop system group and the control group. The closed-loop system group uses a hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system combined with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), while the control group continues to use a traditional insulin pump combined with CGM. During the study, both groups wear CGM devices for continuous monitoring, and relevant clinical data are collected during and after the treatment for statistical analysis to compare the short-term blood glucose control effects of the two intensive insulin treatment regimens in hospitalized LADA patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Hybrid Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas System Group: Uses an open-source system with Novo Nordisk ultra-rapid-acting insulin (approval: J20050097, 3 mL: 300 U). Daily insulin dose calculated at 0.3-0.6 U/(kg\*d) based on weight; system auto-adjusts basal rate. Physicians prescribe bolus doses, entered by nurses via AAPS software. Glucose correction uses CGM + 4 daily capillary tests (fasting, 2h post-meal). AAPS features hypoglycemia prediction suspend (pauses basal if glucose ≤4.4 mmol/L, resumes upon recovery) and alarms (\<3.9 mmol/L, ensures nighttime alert).
Shanxi Bethune Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
RECRUITINGTime required to achieve 70% TIR
Time in Range (TIR) refers to the percentage of time that blood glucose levels are within the target range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L. The calculation formula is: TIR = (Time within the target range / Total time) × 100%
Time frame: 2 years
TIR achievement rate after 5 days of treatment
Time in Range (TIR) refers to the percentage of time that blood glucose levels are within the target range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L. The calculation formula is: TIR = (Time within the target range / Total time) × 100%
Time frame: 5 days
Blood Glucose Control Rate
The criteria for blood glucose target achievement are as follows: fasting blood glucose should be controlled within 4.0 - 7.0 mmol/L, postprandial blood glucose within 5.0 - 10.0 mmol/L, and blood glucose before going to bed within 4.4 - 7.8 mmol/L. The rate of blood glucose target achievement within 1 week of intensive insulin therapy will be statistically analyzed. The calculation formula is: Rate of blood glucose target achievement = (Number of patients achieving blood glucose targets / Total number of patients) × 100%
Time frame: 2 years
Time Below Range (TBR)、Time Above Range (TAR)
Time below the blood glucose target range, which is the percentage of time that blood glucose is below the target range of 3.9 mmol/L. The calculation formula is: TBR = (Time when blood glucose \< 3.9 mmol/L in the target range / Total time) × 100%. Time above the blood glucose target range, which is the percentage of time that blood glucose is above the target range of 10.0 mmol/L. The calculation formula is: TAR = (Time when blood glucose \> 10.0 mmol/L in the target range / Total time) × 100%.
Time frame: 2 years
Hypoglycemia Incidence Rate
The diagnostic criterion for hypoglycemia is a blood glucose level of 3.0 - 3.9 mmol/L. The hypoglycemia incidence rates during the treatment process in the two groups will be counted and compared. The diagnostic criterion for severe hypoglycemia is a blood glucose level \< 3.0 mmol/L. The severe hypoglycemia incidence rates during the treatment process in the two groups will be counted and compared.
Time frame: 2 years
Inter-quartile Range (IQR) of Blood Glucose
The 25th and 75th percentile values of the blood glucose fluctuation range (inter - quartile range, IQR).
Time frame: 2 years
Average Daily Insulin Dosage
During the calculation period, record the specific dose of each injection every day.
Time frame: 2 years
Adverse Event
Count and compare the incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events during the treatment process between the two groups.
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.