The objective of the study is to assess the improvement of synovial hypertrophy during the 12 months of efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis once per week (QW) in joints with existing evidence of synovial hypertrophy in participants with hemophilia A. The study duration for each participant is approximately 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
35
Pharmaceutical form:Lyophilized powder in a sterile vial that requires reconstitution with sterile water for injection (diluent)-Route of administration:Intravenous
Orthopedic Institute for Children- Site Number : 8400009
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGInnovative Hematology, Inc.- Site Number : 8400006
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Proportion of joints with improvement in the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) synovitis domain score
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Change from baseline in the distribution of joint HEAD-US synovitis score
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Number of joints with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has remained unchanged or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of joints with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has remained unchanged or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Trial Transparency email recommended (Toll free for US & Canada)
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Iowa- Site Number : 8400004
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
RECRUITINGOhio State University Hospital East- Site Number : 8400001
Columbus, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 1240003
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 1240004
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 3920003
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 3920002
Hiroshima, Japan
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 3920001
Saitama, Japan
RECRUITINGInvestigational Site Number : 3920004
Tokyo, Japan
RECRUITING...and 3 more locations
Number of index joint type with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has improved, remained unchanged, or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of index joint type with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has improved, remained unchanged, or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Number of participants with at least 1 joint with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has improved, remained unchanged, or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of participants with at least 1 joint with the HEAD-US synovitis domain score that has improved, remained unchanged, or worsened
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Change from baseline in average HEAD-US synovitis domain score across all index joints
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Change from baseline in total/ domain scores of the HEAD-US
HEAD-US scoring system is a simplified ultrasound scanning procedure to image the elbow, knee, and ankle (index joints) and a scoring system based on an additive scale to define the joint status from disease activity and disease damage parameters to evaluate disease progression and monitor the results of treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 26
Change from baseline in total/domain scores of the HJHS
HJHS comprises an assessment of specific features, or items, of the 6 index joints and an assessment of global gait. For each of the 6 joints, the following items are scored: swelling (0 to 3), duration of swelling (0 to 1), muscle atrophy (0 to 2), crepitus on motion (0 to 2), flexion loss (0 to 3), extension loss (0 to 3), joint pain (0 to 2), and strength (0 to 4). The maximum score for an individual index joint is 20. Gait is scored from 0 to 4. The maximum HJHS total score is 124, with a higher score indicating worse joint health.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 26
Change from baseline in total/domain scores of the HJHS
HJHS comprises an assessment of specific features, or items, of the 6 index joints and an assessment of global gait. For each of the 6 joints, the following items are scored: swelling (0 to 3), duration of swelling (0 to 1), muscle atrophy (0 to 2), crepitus on motion (0 to 2), flexion loss (0 to 3), extension loss (0 to 3), joint pain (0 to 2), and strength (0 to 4). The maximum score for an individual index joint is 20. Gait is scored from 0 to 4. The maximum HJHS total score is 124, with a higher score indicating worse joint health.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Change from baseline in total/ domain scores of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MRI will be used to detect changes in synovial hypertrophy in index joints of participants.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Change from baseline in patient-reported outcome (PRO)
Change from baseline in PRO will be assessed by the EQ-5D 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Short Form (PROMIS-SF) version 2.0 Pain Intensity 3a, PROMIS-SF version 1.1 Pain Interference 6a, and PROMIS-SF version 2.0 Physical Function 6b.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 52
Patient reported treatment preference and satisfaction
Patient reported treatment preference and satisfaction will be assessed through surveys and exit interviews.
Time frame: At Week 52
Change from baseline in annualized bleeding rate (ABR) (spontaneous, traumatic)
The ABR will be defined as (number of bleeding episodes occurring during the treatment period)/(duration of the treatment period \[days\]) × 365.25.
Time frame: At Week 52
Change from baseline in annualized joint bleeding rate (AjBR) (spontaneous, traumatic)
The AjBR will be defined as (number of joint bleeding episodes occurring during the treatment period)/(duration of the treatment period \[days\]) × 365.25.
Time frame: At Week 52
Change from baseline in target joint resolution, recurrence, or development
Change from baseline in target joint resolution, recurrence, or development will be assessed.
Time frame: At Week 52
The occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs), all AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESIs)
The safety and tolerability of efanesoctocog alfa evaluated in all participants
Time frame: Up to Week 52