The main goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the drug eRapa works to slow down the progression of disease in patients diagnosed with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). Researchers will compare eRapa to Placebo. The questions to be answered by this trial are: * Does taking eRapa help to slow down the progression of the disease in patients with FAP? * Is eRapa a safe treatment for patients diagnosed with FAP? * What is the effect of eRapa on the number of polyps found in GI tract of patients diagnosed with FAP? * How does treatment with eRapa affect a patient's quality of life? Participants will: * Take eRapa or placebo once per day every other week until disease progresses (gets worse), stops taking part in the trial or dies. * Visit the clinic once every 3 months for check ups and tests. * Have an endoscopy at the start of the trial and then every 6 months to check on whether the disease is getting better or worse.
This is a Phase 3, multi-site, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of eRapa administered to patients with FAP who are at high risk of disease progression. 168 patients with FAP will be enrolled in the trial and randomized 2:1 to receive 0.5 mg eRapa or matching placebo orally, once a day (QD) every other week. There is no minimum treatment duration as this is an event-driven trial; however, the intervention period will continue until disease progression, participant withdrawal from treatment, or until the overall trial endpoint is reached. Participant eligibility is restricted to patients under active surveillance for genetic or clinically diagnosed FAP and who have an intact colon; who are postcolectomy/subtotal colectomy and have documented residual polyps in the rectum/sigmoid or who are post-proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis and documented polyps in the pouch. Eligible participants will undergo a baseline endoscopy and subsequent endoscopic procedures performed every 6 months to monitor for disease progression. Randomized patients will be stratified based on the following disease characteristics: * Intact colon versus post-surgical resection with retained rectum/sigmoid or pouch, and * Duodenal polyposis (current Spigelman stage score ≤2 versus Spigelman stage score ≥3) For the purposes of this trial, high-risk for disease progression is defined as meeting one of the following: * Patients who have intact colons and have \>100 polyps but ≤500 polyps * Patients who have retained rectum/sigmoid or ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis and have ≥10 polyps that are ≥3 mm in diameter, or * Patients who have a history of duodenal polyposis Spigelman stage score of 3 or 4 with at least 1 duodenal polyp that has been removed within 18 months of screening. Trial assessments should be conducted as per the Schedule of Activities with a visit occurring about once every 3 months. Assessment of Spigelman stage will not require a biopsy unless the lesion has an abnormal appearance and/or is ≥10 mm.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
168
0.5 mg capsules for oral use; white opaque capsule filled with off-white powder; Trial intervention will be provided in 28-count round high-density polyethylene bottles with a polypropylene child-resistant screw cap and foil induction seal.
Capsules in 28-count round high-density polyethylene bottles with a polypropylene child-resistant screw cap and foil induction seal.
City of Hope
Arcadia, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGYale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
RECRUITINGGeorgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
RECRUITINGDigestive & Liver Center of Florida
Orlando, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
RECRUITINGJohns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGDana Farber
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
RECRUITING...and 14 more locations
Progression-free survival (PFS) in high-risk patients with FAP treated with eRapa versus placebo.
* Death from any cause * Cancer/high-grade dysplasia * Major FAP-related surgery (e.g., colectomy, proctectomy, total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis \[IPAA\], pouch resection, ileostomy, duodenectomy, or surgical ampullectomy) * Advancement of Spigelman stage (not related solely to increase in polyp number) * Meets criteria for surgery (consistent with United States \[US\] and European Union \[EU\] practice guidelines) (Yang, Gurudu et al. 2020, Zaffaroni, Mannucci et al.2024) * Retained rectum/sigmoid or pouch (≥10 polyps ≥3 mm in size at baseline) * Duodenum (Stage 3/4 and at least 1 polyp ≥10 mm removed in last 18 months)
Time frame: 3 years
The safety and tolerability of eRapa in patients with FAP
-Frequency of all grades (as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version \[v\] 5.0) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in participants receiving eRapa; * Frequency of Grade 3 and higher (as per the CTCAE v5.0) TEAEs in participants receiving eRapa * Percentage of participants discontinuing eRapa treatment due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
Time frame: 3 years
The effect of eRapa treatment on GI polyposis in patients with FAP
* Percent change from baseline in the PB (i.e., the sum of the diameters of all polyps \>3 mm) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months as observed by surveillance endoscopy Note: The total PB will be based on polyps observed in the upper GI tract (duodenum) and the lower GI tract (colon, retained rectum/sigmoid or pouch) * Percent change from baseline in the PB in the upper GI tract (duodenum) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months as observed by upper endoscopy * Percent change from baseline in the PB in the lower GI tract (colon, retained rectum/ sigmoid or pouch) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months as observed by lower endoscopy
Time frame: 3 years
The effect of eRapa treatment on Spigelman stage score in patients with FAP
Change from baseline in Spigelman stage score at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months
Time frame: 3 years
The effect of eRapa treatment on quality-of-life measures, assessed by the 5 level EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
-Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L score at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months;
Time frame: 3 years
Determine the immunomodulating effect of eRapa treatment in patients with FAP
• Change from baseline in T cell phenotypes and function at 12, 24, and 36 months
Time frame: 3 years
The effect of eRapa treatment on quality-of-life measures, assessed by EORTC-30
-Change from baseline in EORTC-30 score at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months;
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.