This is a randomized controlled trial. Previous studies show that both therapeutic ultrasound and sinus massage techniques have significant results in Chronic Rhinosinustis (CRS). However, there is no comparative study carried out between these two to show which technique has more effects in CRS. This study will determine their comparative effects on: 1. Pain measured on Numerical pain rating scale 2. Sinonasal symptoms measured on sino-nasal outcome test questionaire 3. Quality of life measured on rhinosinusitis disability index (RSDI) 4. Nasal inspiratory airflow measured on peak nasal inspiratory flow meter. Participants of chronic rhinosinusitis will be selected according to the diagnostic criteria of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) and will be randomly allocated into three groups. All three group will continue to receive medical intervention. Additionally one group will receive therapeutic ultrasound while other group will receive sinus massage. Whereas third group will be control group and won't receive any additional treatment. Data will be collected at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy and Fauji Foundation Hospital.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
All three groups will continue their prescribed steam protocol and medications by the ENT specialist. This Group will additionally receive a therapeutic Ultrasound over the maxillary sinus.
All three groups will continue their prescribed steam protocol and medications by the ENT specialist. This group will additionally receive, sinus massage (pressure \& milking)
All three groups will continue their prescribed steam protocol and medications by the ENT specialist. This group will not receive any other adjunct physical therapy treatment (control group)
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Pakistan
RECRUITINGPain level
The numeric pain rating scale will be used. The participants rate their pain from 0-10. Scoring: 0 shows no pain, whereas 10 represents the worst pain.
Time frame: 4 weeks
sino-nasal symptoms
Sino-nasal outcome test questionnaire for assessing sino-nasal symptoms The SNOT-22 is a 22-item treatment outcome measure designed for people with chronic sinonasal conditions. The SNOT-22 has been evaluated and is based on a Likert scale. Scoring: 0="No problem", 1="Very mild problem", 2="Mild or slight problem", 3="Moderate problem", 4="Severe problem", and 5="Problem as bad as it can be." Higher scores on SNOT-22 survey items indicate worse patient function or more severe symptoms (total score range: 0-110)
Time frame: 6 weeks
health-related quality of life (HRQL) in rhinosinusitis
Rhino Sinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) in rhinosinusitis The purpose of this scale is to identify difficulties experienced due to nose or sinus problems. The Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) has a total score range of 0-120 and consists of 30 items.
Time frame: 6 weeks
nasal inspiratory flow rate
Peak nasal inspiratory flow meter to evaluate nasal inspiratory flow rate during maximal inspiration It works when a patient inhales through the nose causing air to be drawn through the meter, a cursor moves along the scale to indicate the speed of inhalation. The flow rate achieved can be noted by checking the position of the cursor against the calibrated scale.
Time frame: 6 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.