Our research group has developed an approach for providing families of ICU patients with daily written summaries of care as a supplement to traditional verbal communication. Written summaries describe the patient's main ICU problems and management plan and are delivered to families each day. Despite the benefits of written communication to both the family and clinician experience, the main barrier to implementing this communication approach is the time required for clinicians to create a written summary. For the proposed pilot study, the investgators will ask ICU clinicians to identify patients and respective families for whom there has been a challenge with communication. The investigators will ask ICU clinicians to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families. The investigators hypothesize that this process will acceptable and feasible for ICU clinicians and families.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
27
ICU clinicians will be asked to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Communication Quality (Clinicians)
Clinician participants will ratings of quality of AI-generated written summaries and whether written summaries address family-specific communication challenges (5-point Likert scale, 1-5 points with higher scores indicating better quality)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one week
Communication Quality (Families/Surrogates)
The Family Inpatient Communication Survey (FICS) is a 30-item survey measuring of the quality of communication with the treatment team from the perspective of families of hospitalized patients. Items on this survey measure the informational and emotional aspects of communication, and each item of this survey is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree (30-150 points with higher scores indicating better quality communication)
Time frame: Average one week after enrollment
Acceptability of intervention
Acceptability of the intervention will reflected in adequate enrollment and an average score of at least 3.5 on surveys with 5-point Likert scale measures including the Acceptability of Intervention (AIM), Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Survey (FIM) (1-5 point with higher scores being better)
Time frame: Average one week after enrollment
Feasibility of intervention
Feasibility will be determined by written communication being created for at least 80% of all ICU days and less than 5 minutes on average being spent editing each AI-generated summary.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.