Cold Snare Versus Cold Forceps Polypectomy for Small Lesions

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and the safety of a new device for cold forceps polypectomy (CFP)- a special jumbo forceps- to cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small colorectal lesions, without adding peri- or post-procedural risks to the patient. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the cold forceps guarantee a complete endoscopic resection rate? * How many adverse events could the jumbo forceps reduce in comparison to CSP? * Does the lesion retrieval rate increase? * Does the polypectomy duration decrease? Participants will be randomized to one or to the other group when a polypoid or non-polypoid lesion is identified. If multiple polyps are found in the same patient, they will be removed using the same polypectomy technique. If polypectomy cannot be performed using the indicated technique, a crossover will be done according to the best practice of care principles.

The study is a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. It is designed as a non-inferiority trial to assess whether the efficacy in polypectomy of the new jumbo cold forceps is non-inferior to that of the cold snare. The investigators hypothesize a less number of adverse events with CFP, an increased lesion retrieval rate and a less duration of the polypectomy procedure. All patients will be contacted, 30 days post-polypectomy, by blinded medical staff assessing for possible complications. All consecutive patients with polyp lesions can be enrolled, the participation is voluntary and randomization will be performed using the "minimization technique".

Conditions