Health information avoidance is an overlooked threat to the reach and effectiveness of health communication. To fully realize the benefits of our sizeable investments in health messaging, it is necessary to identify strategies for reducing health information avoidance. The researchers will test a video-based strategy for promoting colorectal cancer screening designed to reduce defensive colorectal cancer information avoidance and increase message reach by increasing engagement among those who would otherwise avoid the message. The researchers will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of the intervention video to an attentional control video on colorectal cancer screening intentions and uptake.
The study will test the efficacy and mediating mechanisms of brief video interventions including elements demonstrated to be effective in reducing health information avoidance (self-efficacy boosting, humor, calm affect induction). It is expected that the videos to benefit people who typically avoid health information yet still be beneficial for people who do not avoid health information, thus being suitable for dissemination to general audiences. It is hypothesized that the interventions will strengthen intentions to be screened, increase colorectal cancer risk information seeking and increase screening. Following recommended practices, the two intervention arms and the control arm will include multiple versions of the videos to control for actor effects. All intervention videos operationalize the same psychological mechanisms but are delivered by 4 different actors and promote either colonoscopy or stool tests. The 8 parallel intervention and 4 control videos will be treated as random effects. The intervention videos will be tested in members of the Ipsos panel who are not adherent to colorectal cancer screening guidelines, half of whom will be selected because they tend to avoid colorectal cancer information. Effects of the intervention videos will be compared to those of an attentional control video about food safety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,500
This video contains elements designed to engage and persuade people who tend to avoid colorectal cancer information to have a colonoscopy. Psychological elements include self-efficacy boosting, humor, and calming affect induction.
This video contains elements designed to engage and persuade people who tend to avoid colorectal cancer information to screen for colorectal cancer with a home test. Psychological elements include self-efficacy boosting, humor, and calming affect induction.
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
Strength of screening intentions
Participants will rate their intention to be screened with the item, "I intend to get checked for colon cancer within the next 6 months" on a scale from 1 to 4 with 4 being stronger intentions.
Time frame: Day 1
Strength of intentions to talk to a health care provider about being screened for colorectal cancer
This outcome will be assessed with the item, "I will talk to a health care provider about getting checked for colon cancer within the next 6 months".
Time frame: Day 1
Proportion of participants who seek personal risk information
Participants will be asked whether they want to be redirected at the end of the study to complete the online Siteman Cancer Center colorectal cancer risk calculator.
Time frame: Day 1
Proportion of participants screened for colorectal cancer after 9 months
The researchers will assess whether participants have been screened for colorectal cancer in the 9 months since participating in the intervention phase of the study.
Time frame: At least 9 months after start of study
Self-efficacy for colorectal cancer screening
Sel-efficacy will be assessed with 2 items with which participants rate their confidence in arranging to get screened and completing a screening test on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: Day 1
Positive and negative affect
Positive and negative affect will be assessed with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (PANAS-SF). Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more of a given affect.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.