The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the effects of these drug combinations (cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and MMF vs cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and ruxolitinib) on the prevention of GVHD after a stem cell transplant.
Primary Objective: To compare Grade 2-4 acute graft versus host disease-free survival (GFS) between the MMF and Ruxolitinib arms Secondary Objectives: To compare the following between treatment arms: 1. Grade 3-5 adverse event of this regimen as per CTCAE v5.0 criteria. 2. Graft versus host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) 3. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment 4. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD 5. Relapse incidence 6. Non relapse mortality 7. Overall survival 8. Progression-free survival 9. Chimerism 10. Immunosuppression cessation time 11. Rate of graft failure Exploratory Objective: To conduct mechanistic studies to compare immune recovery between arms and correlate these with disease control and GVHD prophylaxis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
15 mg/kg/dose (max: 1,000mg/dose) IV/PO three times daily
5 mg PO every 12 hours
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGSafety and Adverse Events (AEs)
Incidence of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version (v) 5.0
Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.