evaluate the clinical outcomes of routine CTR insertion in conjunction with hydrophilic versus hydrophobic IOLs following phacoemulsification.
Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the standard surgical approach for cataract extraction. The choice between hydrophilic and hydrophobic IOLs has been debated, with studies suggesting differences in posterior capsule opacification (PCO) rates and capsular bag stability. Capsular tension rings (CTRs) are devices designed to stabilize the capsular bag, particularly in cases with zonular weakness. While CTRs are beneficial in complex cases, their routine use remains controversial. Understanding the interaction between CTRs and IOL materials could inform surgical practices and improve patient outcomes
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
cataract extracton with phacoemulsification
insertion of capsualr tension ring
implantation of hydrophilic IOL
Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Change in BCVA (LogMAR)
The formula: logMAR score (0.1 NL + 0.02 nl) where NL = number of lines completely read and nl = number of additional letters read ap- plies. For this method, the higher the logMAR VA score, the better the visual acuity.
Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
Refractive error measurements (spherical equivalent)
SE was calculated as the spherical power of the refractive error plus one-half of the cylinder power. Hyperopia was defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) values of ≥ + 1.00 diopter (D) and emmetropia as a SE ranging between 0.99 and - 0.49 D. Myopia was defined as a SE refraction of ≤ -0.50 D.
Time frame: at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
insertion of hydrophobic IOL