One in four children in Sweden experiences chronic pain. For many, the pain is temporary, but for about 5% it significantly affects daily life, leading to sleep problems, school absence, and reduced physical activity. Youth with chronic pain report lower life satisfaction and overall health compared to their peers. In most cases, there is no underlying disease or injury, suggesting that chronic pain is a condition in itself, driven by dysregulation in the pain system and influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. National guidelines in Sweden recommend cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for children and adolescents with chronic pain and substantial functional limitations. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to strengthen the evidence base for these treatments. The investigators' clinic has developed and evaluated ACT-based treatments for pediatric chronic pain over the past two decades. The protocol has now been adapted into an internet-delivered version to increase accessibility. In a preliminary feasibility study, the investigators observed promising effects on pain interference, though some usability issues have since been addressed. The treatment is grounded in the fear-avoidance model, which explains how avoidance of pain-related activities can worsen disability over time. In ACT, such avoidance is seen as driven by unwanted thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations. The aim of treatment is to help young people relate more flexibly to pain and fear and to move toward personally meaningful goals - a skill referred to as psychological flexibility. Exposure is a core component of ACT, encouraging patients to engage with avoided thoughts, feelings, and activities in order to reduce avoidance and improve functioning. In addition to treating the young person, the study also targets parental behaviors. Parents often respond to their child's pain by increasing protection and monitoring, which is natural but can sometimes contribute to further avoidance and reduced independence in the child. ACT-based parent support is designed to help caregivers support their child more effectively. In this randomized trial, internet-delivered ACT will be compared to two control conditions: (1) an active comparator involving online pain education, and (2) a passive control group on a wait list. The pain education intervention is based on Pain Science Education (PSE), which aims to shift how individuals understand their pain - from seeing it as a sign of injury to recognizing it as a false alarm in the nervous system. PSE has shown promising effects in adults, but research in youth is still limited, and no RCTs have yet been published. The study responds to the need for well-designed digital interventions that reach more young people, evaluate treatment components more clearly, and include comparison groups that also receive digital interventions. The goal of the study is to further improve treatment effects by (1) emphasizing exposure strategies to reduce avoidance, (2) expanding pain education to enhance treatment understanding, and (3) refining parent support to better help families manage chronic pain over the long term. The project aims to increase knowledge about the effects of psychological treatments - in this case delivered online - for adolescents with chronic pain. As previous studies have highlighted the promise of exposure-based strategies and digital accessibility, the study aims to evaluate the effect of a treatment that combines and optimizes both. The study also aims to better understand the specific impact of pain education as a stand-alone intervention, as this is a growing research field with limited studies in youth. Regarding the parent support component of ACT, the study will evaluate whether changes in parental behaviors related to their child's pain are associated with reduced parenting stress and improved functioning and quality of life in the adolescents. In addition to evaluating treatment outcomes, the study aims to explore the underlying processes that may contribute to the effects of ACT and pain education.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Participants receive a 9-week internet-delivered intervention: 2 weeks of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) based on the PSE curriculum, followed by 7 weeks of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) targeting psychological flexibility. In addition to value-oriented behavioral activation, the ACT content includes classical exposure. The treatment is mainly text-based, supported by multimedia content, and delivered on a secure digital platform. Communication with a clinician occurs at least weekly. Parents receive a parallel program based on PSE, ACT, and behavioral principles to support flexible and effective parenting.
Participants receive 9 weeks of internet-delivered Pain Science Education (PSE), based on the PSE curriculum but with more detailed content, including extended examples, reflection exercises, and behavioral experiments. The aim is to reduce the threat value of pain by promoting a reconceptualization of pain. Parents receive a parallel program with tailored content. The intervention is text-based with multimedia components and delivered via a secure platform. Clinician support is provided asynchronously at least once weekly.
Karolinska University Hospital
Vallentuna, Sweden
RECRUITINGPain Interference Index
Pain Interference Index (PII) is a 6-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the extent to which pain interferes with daily functioning in children and adolescents. Each item is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no interference" and 10 indicates "complete interference." The total score is the mean of the six items, resulting in a score range from 0 (no interference from pain) to 10 (maximum interference). Higher scores indicate greater interference due to pain.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale-Avoidance (PIPS-A)
The Avoidance subscale of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale - Adolescent version (PIPS-A) consists of 8 items rated on a scale from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Higher scores indicate greater psychological inflexibility through avoidance of pain-related thoughts, feelings, and activities.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
KIDSCREEN-10
The KIDSCREEN-10 Index is a 10-item measure of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Raw scores are transformed into T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Revised-Childrens Anxiety and Depression Scale 25 (RCADS-25)
The RCADS-25 is a 25-item self-report scale assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 75. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Fear of Pain Questionnaire - Child - Short Form (FOPQ-C-SF)
The FOPQ-C-SF is a 10-item self-report scale measuring pain-related fear and avoidance in children and adolescents. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores reflect greater fear of pain and avoidance behavior.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain Intensity
Pain intensity is assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst imaginable pain.' Higher scores indicate higher pain intensity.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain Interference
Pain interference is assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents 'no interference with daily life' and 10 represents 'completely interferes with daily life.' Higher scores indicate greater interference due to pain.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Pain Reactivity Scale for Parents (PRS-P)
The PRS-P consists of 6 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater parental emotional reactivity in response to their child's pain.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
School Absence (Parent-Reported)
Parents report the number of school days missed by their child in the past month due to pain, categorized into intervals: 0-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%, 31-40%, 41-50%, 51-60%, 61-70%, 71-80%, 81-90%, 91-100% of total school days missed.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
The Parent Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (PPFQ-10)
A 10-item questionnaire assessing the psychological flexibility of parents in relation to their child's pain. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater psychological flexibility. The total score can range from 10 to 70, with higher scores reflecting better psychological flexibility in managing stress and responding flexibly to their child's pain-related challenges.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Adult Responses to Children's Symptoms - Protect and Monitor - Youth (ARCS)
This scale assesses the degree to which parents or caregivers respond to their child's pain symptoms with protective and monitoring behaviors. It is typically rated on a Likert scale, where higher scores indicate a higher frequency or intensity of protective and monitoring responses. The total score can vary based on the number of items, but it typically ranges from 0 to a maximum score (for example, 0-24, depending on the number of items on the scale). Higher scores reflect greater protective responses and increased monitoring behavior from the parent or caregiver in reaction to their child's symptoms.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, periprocedural, and directly after completion of the treatment/control condition, as well as at follow-up 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the end of active treatment.
Charlotte Gentili, Licensed Psychologist, PhD
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.