The purpose of this project is to develop and evaluate a multimodal treatment for provoked vulvodynia, by addressing the following specific research questions: 1. What is the feasibility and acceptability of this multimodal treatment protocol? 2. What are the effects on pain and psychosexual health? 3. How is the treatment perceived by patients, clinicians and stakeholders in the health care setting, and how do they view the possibilities for implementation? Participants will be recruited through their health care unit and receive a multimodal treatment. The treatment consists of individual sessions with different professionals, in total 11 sessions over a time period of four months. It is possible to involve partners in the treatment during two of the treatment sessions. The majority of the sessions are digital video meetings but some are conducted at the health care unit. The treatment are based on physiological and psychosocial components that have previously shown positive effects for individuals with vulvodynia, and includes both educational and practical elements. The participants will: * Undergo a gynecological examination and a psychological assessment to determine if the treatment is suitable for their condition * Undergo a multimodal treatment * Complete questionnaires regarding their pain, physical tension, psychosexual and relational health and questions about the treatment * Be asked to participate in an interview about their experience of the treatment and intimacy
The study design consists of a mixed-methods design, where different methods are applied in the various sub-studies of the project. Study 1, is an effectiveness evaluation, applying a sequential single case experimental AB design (SCED) with randomized baseline length, replicated across five healthcare contexts (n≈10-15 per unit, total N≈50-75). Potential participants will be informed about the study at their health care unit and answer a few questions digitally to ensure that participation in the study is appropriate for them. An assessment will then be conducted and questions will be asked about the pain, psychological, sexual and relational health, and a diagnostic interview will be conducted to exclude other psychological issues that needs to be prioritized before vulvodynia treatment. After the assessment interview and inclusion, participants will be randomized to a 4, 5, or 6 week baseline period. Thereafter, the treatment will begin. During the baseline and treatment period, participants will complete a short self-assessment questionnaire, twice a week, to measure pain (primary outcome) and other key variables. To facilitate the repeated assessments, we will use the m-Path app, which was developed by KU Leuven University in Belgium to easily evaluate treatment for both patients and therapists. In addition to the repeated assessments, the treatment will be evaluated through a comprehensive web-based self-assessment questionnaire before and after the intervention and at a six-month follow-up, using the secure survey system called Survey and Report. through Karlstad university. The outcome measures are based on the ongoing work by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services. Study 2, is a qualitative evaluation and initial assessment of the possibilities for implementing the treatment in the Swedish healthcare context. Individual interviews with patients will be conducted and questions will be asked regarding their experience of the treatment model. Focus group interviews will be conducted with practitioners and questions will be asked regarding relevance, relative advantages, consistency with standard practices, usability, and adaptability. Since the treatment will be carried out in five healthcare units with different organizational and practical conditions, questions will specifically address unit-specific aspects that therapists and patients perceive as having facilitated or hindered the implementation and what could be improved in both treatment content and execution. The questions are based on the recommendations of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and the Public Health Agency regarding the initial assessment of implementation possibilities. To obtain the healthcare organization's perspective on implementation possibilities, interviews will be held with health care stakeholders within the participating healthcare units. These interviews will also focus on relevance, relative advantages, consistency with standard practices, usability, and adaptability. The individual and focus group interviews will be conducted in person at the health care units or through digital video meetings. Data from focus group interviews and individual interviews will be recorded by audio, transcribed, and analyzed according to standard qualitative analysis methods, primarily inductive empirically driven Thematic Analysis (TA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
The intervention is based around physiological and psychosocial components working with goal-directed behavioral change. Includes both educational and practical elements, examples of these are vulva care, lubrication exercises, pelvic floor relaxation, work with thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to the pain, as well as thoughts, feelings and behaviors related to sex and desire, and educational and practical elements focusing on open communication and validation. The treatment sessions are approximately 60 minutes each. There is a possibility for the participants to involve partner during two of the treatment sessions.
Karlstad University
Karlstad, Sweden
RECRUITINGChange in pain during touch and/or insertion of an object
Provoked pain during sexual and non-sexual activities. Seven activities where pain is rated on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher scoring indicates higher degree of pain. There are also subsequent questions regarding whether they have performed the described activity or not within a specific time frame.
Time frame: Pre, post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 month follow-up, during baseline (4, 5 or 6 weeks) and treatment period measured twice a week for 25 weeks.
Change in sexual function
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a self-report measure of female sexual function that assesses six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. It consists of 19 questions, rated on a 5-point scale, with a higher score indicating a better sexual function.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
Change in treatment goal attainment
Participants chose an individual treatment goal and rate treatment goal attainment, from 0-10, 0= the goal is not at all achieved, 10= the goal is achieved.
Time frame: Pre, post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 month follow-up. Repeated measures twice a week during baseline (4, 5 or 6 weeks) and treatment period, for 25 weeks.
Change in pelvic floor tension
Self-report assessment of pelvic floor tension and pelvic floor relaxation. Two items rated on a 11-point scale, from 0-10, higher scores indicate greater tension and more difficulty relaxing the pelvic floor, and physiotherapeutic examination.
Time frame: Pre, post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at a 6 month follow-up. During baseline and treatment period measured twice a week, for 25 weeks.
Change in sexual satisfaction
Global measure of sexual satisfaction (GMSEX), 5 items rated on a 7-point scale. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of sexual satisfaction.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
Change in interpersonal and self focused sexual goals
Approach avoidance sexual goals (AASQ), self focused sexual goals and interpersonal sexual goals, 23 items rated on a 7-point scale, participants rates the importance of self focused or interpersonal reasons, influencing why they typically engage in sex. Higher scores indicates greater importance.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started), and at 6 months follow-up
Change in perceived intimacy
9 items regarding self and partner disclosure, partner responsiveness and closeness, rated on a 7-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived intimacy.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started), and at 6 months follow-up
Change in life interference, sexual function interference and impact on relationship
Vulvar pain assessment questionnaire (VPAQ) Inventory is a disease-specific set of measurement scales to capture the biopsychosocial nature of vulvodynia. We are using the parts from the questionnaire that evaluates life interference, sexual function interference, impact on relationship and sexual communication. Life interference: 11 items rated on a 6-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (avoid because of pain). Higher scores indicating greater life interference. Sexual function interference: 10 items rated on a 6-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (avoid because of pain) Impact on relationship: 6 items about intimacy and, general and sexual communication rated on a 5-point scale from much worse to much better. Higher scoring indicates that the vulva pain has lower impact on the relationship. 6 items about communication with partner rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (largely uncomfortable) to 4 (largely comfortable). Higher scoring indicates
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
Change in depressive symptoms
Using the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), 9 items are rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicating higher degree of depression symtoms.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
Change in anxiety symptoms
Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7), 7 items rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, higher scoring indicating a higher degree of anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
Change in quality of life
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, 1 item where participants rates their quality of life, on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5, higher scoring indicating greater quality of life.
Time frame: Pre and post treatment (25 weeks after the baseline measurement started) and at 6 months follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.