Patients undergoing bariatric surgery often present challenges during intubation due to limited neck mobility, increased soft tissue in the airway, and elevated body mass index (BMI). Predicting difficult intubation in these patients is critical to ensuring safety. The Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI) by Ganzouri is a validated tool for predicting difficult intubation. It considers factors like neck mobility, Mallampati score, and body weight, which are highly relevant in difficult airway prediction in the bariatric population. The CMAC video laryngoscope is widely used to manage difficult airways. Two commonly used devices are the CMAC D-Blade, designed explicitly for difficult airways, and the CMAC Video stylet, which combines video guidance with a flexible tip. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of these two devices in bariatric patients with an anticipated difficult airway, as identified by the SARI.
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of the CMAC D-Blade versus the CMAC Video-style for awake bedside airway assessment and their performance during tracheal intubation in bariatric patients with expected difficult intubation as predicted by the Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI). Standard monitoring will be attached and recorded. Preoperative awake airway assessment: after airway topicalization, both devices will be used for airway assessment according to the group allocation, and the Cormack and Leane will be recorded. Induction of Anesthesia: A standardized protocol will be followed for all patients, including preoxygenation and administration of propofol, fentanyl, and muscle relaxants (e.g., rocuronium). Intubation: The intubating anesthetist will use the assigned device. \- Rescue Strategy: If intubation fails after three attempts or exceeds 120 seconds, the anesthetist will switch to an alternative device or follow the institutional difficult airway protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
150
Intubation will be performed using the CMAC D-Blade
Intubation will be performed using the CMAC Video stylet
Madina Women's Hospital
Alexandria, Egypt
The surgical department of Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Egypt
First-Pass Success Rate
This is a successful intubation on the first attempt without needing an alternative device.
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Time to Intubation
Measured from the insertion of the device into the mouth until confirmation of endotracheal tube placement via capnography.
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS)
A composite score based on multiple intubation-related factors, such as the number of attempts, additional maneuvers, and the application of external laryngeal pressure.
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Stress response of intubation
serum level of stress markers measured before and after intubation (catecholamines)
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
awake Cormack-Lehane Classification
awake Cormack-Lehane Classification of Glottic View assessment and after induction of anesthesia during the intubation process.
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Operator satisfaction
the anesthesiologist rated their satisfaction with the device performance on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = extremely satisfied, 4 = satisfied, 3 = neutral, 2 = dissatisfied, 1 = extremely dissatisfied).
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Complications
for example, 1. Hypoxemia (SpO₂ \< 92%) 2. Esophageal intubation or failed intubation 3. Airway trauma (dental or oropharyngeal injury)
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
Need for Alternative Intubation Devices
Documentation of cases where the initially assigned device failed, and an alternative was needed.
Time frame: At the time of the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.