Objective The aim of this study is to compare salivary flow rate, salivary pH, salivary buffering capacity, plaque index, gingival index, DMFT/dft indices, and body mass index (BMI) in systemically healthy children aged 5-10 years with and without black stains (BS) in the oral cavity. By evaluating the differences between these two groups, we seek to better understand the effects of black stains on oral health and assess the relationship between BMI and these parameters. The findings may contribute to improved oral health management, preventive dentistry practices, and a deeper understanding of the association between obesity and oral health in children. Methods This study will consist of two groups of systemically healthy children: those with black stains (BS group, n=50) and those without (non-BS group, n=50). Both groups will be examined to determine the d (decayed), f (filled), and t (missing) values for primary teeth (dft index) and D (decayed), M (missing), and F (filled) values for permanent teeth (DMFT index). We will assess plaque index and gingival index using Silness-Löe (1963, 1967) criteria. Saliva samples will be collected under standardized conditions (at least 2 hours post-breakfast, between 9-11 AM, after rinsing with water) in an isolated dental unit with patients seated upright. Salivary pH will be measured using pH strips (GC Saliva-Check BUFFER) from unstimulated saliva. We will categorize pH levels as: highly acidic (5.0-5.8, red), moderately acidic (6.0-6.6, yellow), or healthy (6.8-7.8, green). For salivary flow rate measurement, stimulated saliva will be collected after paraffin chewing (5 minutes) and measured in mL/min. Salivary buffering capacity will be evaluated using GC Saliva-Check BUFFER test pads and scored as: very low (0-5), low (6-9), or normal/high (10-12). We will calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) as kg/m² and interpret results using age- and sex-specific percentiles. Statistical analysis will compare all parameters between the two groups.
This study will compare salivary parameters (pH, flow rate, buffering capacity), plaque index, gingival index, DMFT/dft indices, and BMI between healthy children aged 5-10 years with (n=50) and without (n=50) black stains (BS). Saliva samples will be collected under standardized conditions, oral health parameters will be recorded through clinical examinations, and statistical analysis will assess differences between the two groups. The aim is to evaluate the impact of BS on oral health and its potential association with BMI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
In children with black stains (BS+), we evaluated DMFT, dft, plaque index (Silness-Löe), gingival index (Löe-Silness), salivary pH, salivary flow rate, salivary buffering capacity, and body mass index (BMI).
In healthy children without black stains (BS-), we assessed DMFT, dft, plaque index (Silness-Löe), gingival index (Löe-Silness), salivary pH, salivary flow rate, salivary buffering capacity, and body mass index (BMI).
Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Antalya, Konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye)
DMFT index
To determine the DMFT index score, decayed teeth in permanent teeth are indicated as "D", lost teeth extracted due to decay are indicated as "M", and filled teeth are indicated as "F". The DMFT index is calculated by adding the D, M, F values and dividing them by the total number of permanent teeth. An increase in the calculated scores indicates that oral and dental health is negatively affected.
Time frame: 2 months
dft index
The dft Index is the calculated form of the DMFT index for primary teeth. When calculating the dft group index, missing teeth are not included in the calculation. Because it is difficult to diagnose the reason for the loss of primary teeth and there is a high probability of error. For this reason, the number of decayed and filled teeth is calculated during the examination. Decayed teeth are indicated with "d" and filled teeth with "f". The dft index is calculated by adding the d and f values and dividing them by the total number of permanent teeth. An increase in the calculated scores indicates that oral and dental health is negatively affected
Time frame: 2 months
Saliva pH
Salivary pH was measured using pH indicator strips. A low pH (\<6.5) indicates an acidic environment and increases the risk of tooth demineralization and caries, whereas a high pH (\>7.5) indicates an alkaline state, which may be linked to decreased bacterial activity but may also indicate systemic conditions.
Time frame: 2 months
Unstimulated salivary flow rate
Unstimulated salivary flow rate is measured by collecting unstimulated saliva over a period of time and calculating the volume per minute. A low flow rate (\<0.1 mL/min) indicates hyposalivation, which increases the risk of caries and oral infection, while a high flow rate may be associated with conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux or medication effects.
Time frame: 2 months
Saliva buffering capacity
Saliva buffering capacity was measured using the GC Saliva Buffer Kit, which uses a scoring system based on color changes. A low buffering capacity indicates a higher risk of dental caries and enamel demineralization, whereas a high buffering capacity indicates better protection against acid attacks in the oral environment.
Time frame: 2 months
PIaque index (PI)
Based on Silness-Löe (1963, 1967) PI values, bacterial plaque and plaque thickness in direct contact with the marginal gingiva are evaluated. The evaluation is made with the Williams-marked University of Michigan 'O' periodontal probe, and PI values are recorded from a total of 4 surfaces of each tooth included in the study, namely mesial, distal, buccal and lingual. The averages of these values are calculated for each patient. The average scores obtained are evaluated in the 0-3 score range. An increase in the calculated scores indicates that periodontal health is negatively affected.
Time frame: 2 months
Gingival index (GI)
The degree of gingivitis is assessed using the Silness-Löe (1963, 1967) GI. The average of the measurements taken from four sides of the tooth determines the GI score of the tooth, and the average of the measurements of all teeth determines the individual's gingival index score. The scores obtained are evaluated in the range of 0-3. An increase in the calculated scores indicates that periodontal health is negatively affected.
Time frame: 2 months
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI is calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in meters) (kg/m²). In children, unlike adults, BMI is evaluated using age- and sex-specific percentile curves. An increase in BMI indicates a higher risk of obesity, which is associated with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and oral health problems such as periodontal disease and caries. A decrease in BMI may suggest undernutrition or growth retardation, potentially affecting immune function and dental development.
Time frame: 2 months
Percentile
Percentile is a statistical measure that indicates a child's BMI relative to other children of the same age and sex. It is determined using WHO (World Health Organization) or CDC growth charts.A high percentile (≥85th) indicates that the child is heavier than peers, increasing the risk of obesity and metabolic complications. A low percentile (\<5th) suggests growth retardation or malnutrition risk, which may manifest as oral mucosal lesions or delayed tooth development.
Time frame: 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.